The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applicability of the BET Method for Determining Surface Areas of Microporous Metal−Organic Frameworks
Abstract
The surface area is one of the most important quantities for characterizing novel porous materials. The BET analysis is the standard method for determining surface areas from nitrogen adsorption isotherms and was originally derived for multilayer gas adsorption onto flat surfaces. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a relatively new class of crystalline, porous materials that have been shown to exhibit very large BET surface areas. These materials are microporous and possess surfaces that are far from flat. In some MOFs, adsorption occurs through a pore-filling mechanism rather than by layer formation. Thus, it is unclear whether BET surface area numbers reported for these materials are truly meaningful. Given the standard practice of reporting BET surface areas for novel porous materials, a critical test of the BET method is much needed. In this work, grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict adsorption isotherms for nitrogen in a series of MOFs. The predicted isotherms were used as pseudoexperimental data to test the applicability of the BET theory for obtaining surface areas of microporous MOFs. BET surface areas calculated from the simulated isotherms agree very well with the accessible surface areas calculated directly from the crystal structures in a geometric fashion. In addition, the surface areas agree well with experimental reports in the literature. These results provide a strong validation that the BET theory can be used to obtain surface areas of MOFs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of adsorption isotherm models: a review
Al-Ghouti, M. A., & Da'ana, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122383 · Cited by 3,535
Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review
Hua, M., Zhang, S., Pan, B., Zhang, W., Lv, L., & Zhang, Q. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.016 · Cited by 2,193
Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks
Wilmer, C. E., Leaf, M., Lee, C. Y., Farha, O. K., Hauser, B. G., Hupp, J. T., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1192 · Cited by 1,439
Self-citationChallenges and breakthroughs in recent research on self-assembly
Ariga, K., Hill, J. P., Lee, M. V., Vinu, A., Charvet, R., & Acharya, S. (2008) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/9/1/014109 · Cited by 759
Sarkisov, L., & Harrison, A. (2011) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2011.592832 · Cited by 658
Metadata
- Authors
- Walton, K. S., & Snurr, R. Q.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-06-20
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 8552-8556
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2050343674
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applicability of the BET Method for Determining Surface Areas of Microporous Metal−Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja071174k
- The paper
- Walton, K. S., & Snurr, R. Q. (2007). Applicability of the BET Method for Determining Surface Areas of Microporous Metal−Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja071174k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.