The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting with Mesoporous Hematite Prepared by a Solution-Based Colloidal Approach
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable hydrogen production through photoelectrochemical water splitting using hematite (alpha-Fe(2)O(3)) is a promising approach for the chemical storage of solar energy, but is complicated by the material's nonoptimal optoelectronic properties. Nanostructuring approaches have been shown to increase the performance of hematite, but the ideal nanostructure giving high efficiencies for all absorbed light wavelengths remains elusive. Here, we report for the first time mesoporous hematite photoelectodes prepared by a solution-based colloidal method which yield water-splitting photocurrents of 0.56 mA cm(-2) under standard conditions (AM 1.5G 100 mW cm(-2), 1.23 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) and over 1.0 mA cm(-2) before the dark current onset (1.55 V vs RHE). The sintering temperature is found to increase the average particle size, and have a drastic effect on the photoactivity. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and magnetic measurements using a SQUID magnetometer link this effect to the diffusion and incorporation of dopant atoms from the transparent conducting substrate. In addition, examining the optical properties of the films reveals a considerable change in the absorption coefficient and onset properties, critical aspects for hematite as a solar energy converter, as a function of the sintering temperature. A detailed investigation into hematite's crystal structure using powder X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement to account for these effects correlates an increase in a C(3v)-type crystal lattice distortion to the improved optical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optical Properties and Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium
Tauc, J., Grigorovici, R., & Vancu, A. (1966) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.19660150224 · Cited by 11,071
The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurences and Uses
Cornell, R. M., & Schwertmann, U. (2003) · doi:10.1002/3527602097 · Cited by 4,422
Nazeeruddin, M. K., De Angelis, F., Fantacci, S., Selloni, A., Viscardi, G., Liska, P., Ito, S., Takeru, B., & Grätzel, M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja052467l · Cited by 2,749
Self-citationMagnetic Properties of Nanostructured Materials
Leslie-Pelecky, D. L., & Rieke, R. D. (1996) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm960077f · Cited by 1,721
New Benchmark for Water Photooxidation by Nanostructured α-Fe2O3 Films
Kay, A., Cesar, I., & Grätzel, M. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja064380l · Cited by 1,562
Self-citationCriteria for Choosing Transparent Conductors
Gordon, R. G. (2000) · MRS Bulletin · doi:10.1557/mrs2000.151 · Cited by 1,539
GOODENOUGH, J. (1971) · Progress in Solid State Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0079-6786(71)90018-5 · Cited by 1,239
Magnetic Relaxation in Fine‐Particle Systems
Dormann, J. L., Fiorani, D., & Tronc, E. (1997) · Advances in Chemical Physics · doi:10.1002/9780470141571.ch4 · Cited by 983
Efficiency of solar water splitting using semiconductor electrodes
MURPHY, A., BARNES, P., RANDENIYA, L., PLUMB, I., GREY, I., HORNE, M., & GLASSCOCK, J. (2006) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.014 · Cited by 875
Cesar, I., Kay, A., Gonzalez Martinez, J. A., & Grätzel, M. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja060292p · Cited by 788
Self-citation
Cited by
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Visible-light driven heterojunction photocatalysts for water splitting – a critical review
Moniz, S. J. A., Shevlin, S. A., Martin, D. J., Guo, Z.-X., & Tang, J. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03271c · Cited by 2,363
Meng, F., Li, J., Cushing, S. K., Zhi, M., & Wu, N. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja404851s · Cited by 643
Identifying champion nanostructures for solar water-splitting
Warren, S. C., Voïtchovsky, K., Dotan, H., Leroy, C. M., Cornuz, M., Stellacci, F., Hébert, C., Rothschild, A., & Grätzel, M. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3684 · Cited by 561
Self-citationCobalt-phosphate (Co-Pi) catalyst modified Mo-doped BiVO4 photoelectrodes for solar water oxidation
Pilli, S. K., Furtak, T. E., Brown, L. D., Deutsch, T. G., Turner, J. A., & Herring, A. M. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee02444b · Cited by 554
Back Electron–Hole Recombination in Hematite Photoanodes for Water Splitting
Le Formal, F., Pendlebury, S. R., Cornuz, M., Tilley, S. D., Grätzel, M., & Durrant, J. R. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja412058x · Cited by 494
Self-citationHematite-based solar water splitting: challenges and opportunities
Lin, Y., Yuan, G., Sheehan, S., Zhou, S., & Wang, D. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01850g · Cited by 417
Lianos, P. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.083 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Sivula, K., Zboril, R., Le Formal, F., Robert, R., Weidenkaff, A., Tucek, J., Frydrych, J., & Grätzel, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-05-05
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7436-7444
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2010052150
- Cited by
- 937
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 29.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
