The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Calculation of Diffusion Limitations in Metal Organic Framework Materials: A Tool for Identifying Materials for Kinetic Separations
Abstract
The very large number of distinct structures that are known for metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and related materials presents both an opportunity and a challenge for identifying materials with useful properties for targeted applications. We show that efficient computational models can be used to evaluate large numbers of MOFs for kinetic separations of light gases based on finding materials with large differences between the diffusion coefficients of adsorbed gas species. We introduce a geometric approach that rapidly identifies the key features of a pore structure that control molecular diffusion and couple this with efficient molecular modeling calculations that predict the Henry's constant and diffusion activation energy for a range of spherical adsorbates. We demonstrate our approach for >500 MOFs and >160 silica zeolites. Our results indicate that many large pore MOFs will be of limited interest for separations based on kinetic effects, but we identify a significant number of materials that are predicted to have extraordinary properties for separation of gases such as CO(2), CH(4), and H(2).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van der Waals Volumes and Radii
Bondi, A. (1964) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100785a001 · Cited by 19,350
UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations
Rappe, A. K., Casewit, C. J., Colwell, K. S., Goddard, W. A., & Skiff, W. M. (1992) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00051a040 · Cited by 10,557
Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework
Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O'Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46248 · Cited by 8,554
Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks
Park, K. S., Ni, Z., Côté, A. P., Choi, J. Y., Huang, R., Uribe-Romo, F. J., Chae, H. K., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602439103 · Cited by 7,563
A Chemically Functionalizable Nanoporous Material [Cu 3 (TMA) 2 (H 2 O) 3 ] n
Chui, S. S.-Y., Lo, S. M.-F., Charmant, J. P. H., Orpen, A. G., & Williams, I. D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5405.1148 · Cited by 6,063
Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future
Férey, G. (2008) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b618320b · Cited by 5,822
Cordero, B., Gómez, V., Platero-Prats, A. E., Revés, M., Echeverría, J., Cremades, E., Barragán, F., & Alvarez, S. (2008) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/b801115j · Cited by 4,169
Molecular theory of gases and liquids
Scott, R. L. (1955) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed032p232.2 · Cited by 3,934
Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes
Robeson, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-j · Cited by 3,465
The pervasive chemistry of metal–organic frameworks
Long, J. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b903811f · Cited by 2,394
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials
Willems, T. F., Rycroft, C. H., Kazi, M., Meza, J. C., & Haranczyk, M. (2012) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 · Cited by 1,925
Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks
Wilmer, C. E., Leaf, M., Lee, C. Y., Farha, O. K., Hauser, B. G., Hupp, J. T., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1192 · Cited by 1,439
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Chung, Y. G., Haldoupis, E., Bucior, B. J., Haranczyk, M., Lee, S., Zhang, H., Vogiatzis, K. D., Milisavljevic, M., Ling, S., Camp, J. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data · doi:10.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 · Cited by 863
Self-citationLigand design for functional metal–organic frameworks
Almeida Paz, F. A., Klinowski, J., Vilela, S. M. F., Tomé, J. P. C., Cavaleiro, J. A. S., & Rocha, J. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15055c · Cited by 855
Perspective of microporous metal–organic frameworks for CO2capture and separation
Zhang, Z., Yao, Z.-Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2014) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee00143e · Cited by 767
Chung, Y. G., Camp, J., Haranczyk, M., Sikora, B. J., Bury, W., Krungleviciute, V., Yildirim, T., Farha, O. K., Sholl, D. S., & Snurr, R. Q. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm502594j · Cited by 743
Self-citationBae, T., Lee, J. S., Qiu, W., Koros, W. J., Jones, C. W., & Nair, S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201006141 · Cited by 678
Self-citationSarkisov, L., & Harrison, A. (2011) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2011.592832 · Cited by 658
New Stories of Zeolite Structures: Their Descriptions, Determinations, Predictions, and Evaluations
Li, Y., & Yu, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500010r · Cited by 603
Current Status of Metal–Organic Framework Membranes for Gas Separations: Promises and Challenges
Shah, M., McCarthy, M. C., Sachdeva, S., Lee, A. K., & Jeong, H.-K. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie202038m · Cited by 494
High-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks
Colón, Y. J., & Snurr, R. Q. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00070f · Cited by 470
Cheng, N., Ren, L., Xu, X., Du, Y., & Dou, S. X. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201801257 · Cited by 359
Force-Field Prediction of Materials Properties in Metal-Organic Frameworks
Boyd, P. G., Moosavi, S. M., Witman, M., & Smit, B. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02532 · Cited by 304
Opportunities and challenges of MOF-based membranes in gas separations
Adatoz, E., Avci, A. K., & Keskin, S. (2015) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2015.08.020 · Cited by 288
CO2 Capture from Dilute Gases as a Component of Modern Global Carbon Management
Jones, C. W. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114252 · Cited by 268
Measurement, Standards, and Data Needs for CO2 Capture Materials: A Critical Review
Espinal, L., Poster, D. L., Wong-Ng, W., Allen, A. J., & Green, M. L. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402622q · Cited by 161
Pore size analysis of >250 000 hypothetical zeolites
Haldoupis, E., Nair, S., & Sholl, D. S. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp02766a · Cited by 89
Self-citationPerformance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture
Farmahini, A. H., Krishnamurthy, S., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., & Sarkisov, L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Haldoupis, E., Nair, S., & Sholl, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-05-07
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7528-7539
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2084879615
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 20.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
