The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Design of FRET-Based Ratiometric Chemosensors for in Vitro and in Cell Fluorescence Analyses of Nucleoside Polyphosphates
Abstract
Ratiometric fluorescence sensing is a useful technique for the precise and quantitative analysis of biological events occurring under complex conditions, such as those inside cells. We report herein the design of new ratiometric chemosensors for nucleoside polyphosphates such as ATP that are based on binding-induced modulation of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) coupled with a turn-on fluorescence-sensing mechanism. We designed these new FRET-based ratiometric chemosensors by utilizing spectral overlap changes to modulate the FRET efficiency. Introduction of coumarin fluorophores as the FRET donors into a binuclear zinc complex as the FRET acceptor provided the ratiometric chemosensors. These chemosensors exhibited a clear dual-mission signal change upon binding with strong affinity (K(app) ≈ 10(6)-10(7) M(-1)) to nucleoside polyphosphates in aqueous solution, whereas no detectable emission change was observed with monophosphates and phosphodiester species or various other anions. These chemosensors were used for real-time fluorescence monitoring of enzyme reactions such as saccharide synthesis by glycosyltransferase and phosphorylation by protein kinase, both of which involve nucleoside polyphosphates as substrates. The utility of ratiometric sensing by chemosensors was further demonstrated in a fluorescence-imaging study of the nucleoside polyphosphates inside living cells, wherein we ratiometrically visualized the stimulus-responsive concentration change of ATP, an indicator of the cellular energy level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation
Vander Heiden, M. G., Cantley, L. C., & Thompson, C. B. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1160809 · Cited by 16,197
Physiological concentrations of purines and pyrimidines
Traut, T. W. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00928361 · Cited by 1,867
Untangling tau hyperphosphorylation in drug design for neurodegenerative diseases
Mazanetz, M. P., & Fischer, P. M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2111 · Cited by 459
Cited by
Small molecule-based ratiometric fluorescence probes for cations, anions, and biomolecules
Lee, M. H., Kim, J. S., & Sessler, J. L. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00280f · Cited by 1,642
Applications of Supramolecular Anion Recognition
Busschaert, N., Caltagirone, C., Van Rossom, W., & Gale, P. A. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00099 · Cited by 1,249
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurishita, Y., Kohira, T., Ojida, A., & Hamachi, I.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-02
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 13290-13299
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2092346007
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational Design of FRET-Based Ratiometric Chemosensors for in Vitro and in Cell Fluorescence Analyses of Nucleoside Polyphosphates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja103615z
- The paper
- Kurishita, Y., Kohira, T., Ojida, A., & Hamachi, I. (2010). Rational Design of FRET-Based Ratiometric Chemosensors for in Vitro and in Cell Fluorescence Analyses of Nucleoside Polyphosphates. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja103615z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.