Cited by 1,867Biochemical and Molecular ResearchCancer and biochemical researchDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Physiological concentrations of purines and pyrimidines

Traut, Thomas W.·1994·Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Abstract

The concentrations of bases, nucleosides, and nucleosides mono-, di- and tri-phosphate are compared for about 600 published values. The data are predominantly from mammalian cells and fluids. For the most important ribonucleotides, average concentrations +/- SD (microM) are: ATP, 3,152 +/- 1,698; GTP, 468 +/- 224; UTP, 567 +/- 460 and CTP, 278 +/- 242. For deoxynucleosides-triphosphate (dNTP), the concentrations in dividing cells are: dATP, 24 +/- 22; dGTP, 5.2 +/- 4.5; dCTP, 29 +/- 19 and dTTP 37 +/- 30. By comparison, dUTP is usually about 0.2 microM. For the 4 dNTPs, tumor cells have concentrations of 6-11 fold over normal cells, and for the 4 NTPs, tumor cells also have concentrations 1.2-5 fold over the normal cells. By comparison, the concentrations of NTPs are significantly lower in various types of blood cells. The average concentration of bases and nucleosides in plasma and other extracellular fluids is generally in the range of 0.4-6 microM; these values are usually lower than corresponding intracellular concentrations. For phosphate compounds, average cellular concentrations are: Pi, 4400; ribose-1-P, 55; ribose-5-P, 70 and P-ribose-PP, 9.0. The metal ion magnesium, important for coordinating phosphates in nucleotides, has values (mM) of: free Mg2+, 1.1; complexed-Mg, 8.0. Consideration of experiments on the intracellular compartmentation of nucleotides shows support for this process between the cytoplasm and mitochondria, but not between the cytoplasm and the nucleus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00928361

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Circulating nucleotide concentrations are likely too low for many tumors to satisfy their nucleotide demand through salvage alone.

    “Though nucleotide salvage pathways can support tumor cell proliferation in certain contexts (Tabata et al., 2017), concentrations of circulating nucleotides are likely too low for many tumors to satisfy their nucleotides demand via salvage alone (Traut, 1994).”

    From Targeting Metabolism for Cancer Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as Traut, 1994

  • Upon G12 and G13 mutation, GAP-mediated K-Ras inactivation is hampered, resulting in accumulation of GTP-bound active K-Ras.

    “Upon G12 and G13 mutation, GAPs-mediated K-Ras inactivation is hampered, resulting in the accumulation of GTP-bound active K-Ras.24,39”

    From Overcoming Resistance to Drugs Targeting KRAS Mutation (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The difficulty of drugging KRAS reflects picomolar RAS affinity for GTP, high intracellular GTP concentration of about 500 nM, and the absence of a deep or pharmacologically actionable small-molecule-binding pocket; GTP-competitive RAS inhibitors are therefore unfeasible.

    “The several-decade struggle to drug KRAS and other RAS isoforms25,61 reflects challenges posed by three key biochemical features: first, the picomolar affinity of RAS proteins for GTP62; second, the high intracellular concentrations of GTP (~500 nM)9; and third, the absence of a deep or pharmacologically actionable small-molecule-binding pocket in the RAS proteins.”
  • Because the cellular GTP:GDP ratio is about 10, RAS-GEFs catalyse GDP-to-GTP exchange in cells.

    “RAS-GEFs can promote the release of either GDP or GTP from RAS proteins in vitro; however, because the cellular GTP:GDP ratio is ~10 (refs.8,9), they catalyse GDP-to-GTP exchange in cells.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Traut, T. W.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Traut, Thomas W.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
Published
1994
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0300-8177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4919
OpenAlex
W2045074917
Cited by
1,867
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 53
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
purines, pyrimidines, nucleotide concentration, nucleosides, ribonucleotides, deoxynucleotides, ATP, GTP, UTP, CTP, dNTPs, extracellular nucleotides, cancer cells, blood cells, intracellular phosphate, ribose-1-phosphate, ribose-5-phosphate, magnesium
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cells, Cultured, Extracellular Space, Humans, Neoplasms, Nucleosides, Nucleotides, Purines, Pyrimidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review