The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wave Function Engineering for Ultrafast Charge Separation and Slow Charge Recombination in Type II Core/Shell Quantum Dots
Abstract
The size dependence of optical and electronic properties of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have been extensively studied in various applications ranging from solar energy conversion to biological imaging. Core/shell QDs allow further tuning of these properties by controlling the spatial distributions of the conduction-band electron and valence-band hole wave functions through the choice of the core/shell materials and their size/thickness. It is possible to engineer type II core/shell QDs, such as CdTe/CdSe, in which the lowest energy conduction-band electron is largely localized in the shell while the lowest energy valence-band hole is localized in the core. This spatial distribution enables ultrafast electron transfer to the surface-adsorbed electron acceptors due to enhanced electron density on the shell materials, while simultaneously retarding the charge recombination process because the shell acts as a tunneling barrier for the core localized hole. Using ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy, we show that in CdTe/CdSe-anthraquinone (AQ) complexes, after the initial ultrafast (~770 fs) intra-QD electron transfer from the CdTe core to the CdSe shell, the shell-localized electron is transferred to the adsorbed AQ with a half-life of 2.7 ps. The subsequent charge recombination from the reduced acceptor, AQ(-), to the hole in the CdTe core has a half-life of 92 ns. Compared to CdSe-AQ complexes, the type II band alignment in CdTe/CdSe QDs maintains similar ultrafast charge separation while retarding the charge recombination by 100-fold. This unique ultrafast charge separation and slow recombination property, coupled with longer single and multiple exciton lifetimes in type II QDs, suggests that they are ideal light-harvesting materials for solar energy conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Cited by
Spectroscopic and Device Aspects of Nanocrystal Quantum Dots
Pietryga, J. M., Park, Y.-S., Lim, J., Fidler, A. F., Bae, W. K., Brovelli, S., & Klimov, V. I. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00169 · Cited by 1,040
Nanointerface Chemistry: Lattice-Mismatch-Directed Synthesis and Application of Hybrid Nanocrystals
Liu, J., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00443 · Cited by 423
Quantum confined colloidal nanorod heterostructures for solar-to-fuel conversion
Wu, K., & Lian, T. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00472a · Cited by 305
Self-citationJiao, S., Shen, Q., Mora-Seró, I., Wang, J., Pan, Z., Zhao, K., Kuga, Y., Zhong, X., & Bisquert, J. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn506638n · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, H., Song, N., & Lian, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-05-17
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8762-8771
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2321447383
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wave Function Engineering for Ultrafast Charge Separation and Slow Charge Recombination in Type II Core/Shell Quantum Dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja202752s
- The paper
- Zhu, H., Song, N., & Lian, T. (2011). Wave Function Engineering for Ultrafast Charge Separation and Slow Charge Recombination in Type II Core/Shell Quantum Dots. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja202752s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.