Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of Immunoglobulin G4 Fab-arm Exchange

Rispens, Theo, Ooijevaar-de Heer, Pleuni, Bende, Onno, Aalberse, Rob C.·2011·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies are symmetrical molecules that may be regarded as covalent dimers of 2 half-molecules, each consisting of a light chain and a heavy chain. Human IgG4 is an unusually dynamic antibody, with half-molecule exchange ("Fab-arm exchange") resulting in asymmetrical, bispecific antibodies with two different antigen binding sites, which contributes to its anti-inflammatory activity. The mechanism of this process is unknown. To elucidate the elementary steps of this intermolecular antibody rearrangement, we developed a quantitative real-time FRET assay to monitor the kinetics of this process. We found that an intrinsic barrier is the relatively slow dissociation of the CH3 domains that noncovalently connect the heavy chains, which becomes rate determining in case disulfide bonds between the heavy chains are reduced or absent. Under redox conditions that mimic the previously estimated in vivo reaction rate, i.e., 1 mM of reduced glutathione, the overall rate is ca. 20 times lower because only a fraction of noncovalent isomers is present (with intra- rather than interheavy chain disulfide bonds), formed in a relatively fast pre-equilibrium from covalent isomers. Interestingly, Fab arms stabilize the covalent isomer: the amount of noncovalent isomers is ca. 3 times higher for Fc fragments of IgG4 (lacking Fab domains) compared to intact IgG4, and the observed rate of exchange is 3 times higher accordingly. Thus, kinetic data obtained from a sensitive and quantitative real-time FRET assay as described here yield accurate data about interdomain interactions such as those between Fab and/or Fc domains. The results imply that in vivo, the reaction is under control of local redox conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja203638y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Rispens, T., Ooijevaar-de Heer, P., Bende, O., & Aalberse, R. C.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2011-06-15
Volume
133
Issue
26
Pages
10302-10311
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2153600773
Cited by
184
References
1
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.