Cited by 153Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchEnzyme Structure and FunctionEnzyme function and inhibition

Structural Basis of the Antiproliferative Activity of Largazole, a Depsipeptide Inhibitor of the Histone Deacetylases

Open access
Cole, Kathryn E., Dowling, Daniel P., Boone, Matthew A., Phillips, Andrew J., Christianson, David W.·2011·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Largazole is a macrocyclic depsipeptide originally isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Symploca sp., which is indigenous to the warm, blue-green waters of Key Largo, Florida (whence largazole derives its name). Largazole contains an unusual thiazoline-thiazole ring system that rigidifies its macrocyclic skeleton, and it also contains a lipophilic thioester side chain. Hydrolysis of the thioester in vivo yields largazole thiol, which exhibits remarkable antiproliferative effects and is believed to be the most potent inhibitor of the metal-dependent histone deacetylases (HDACs). Here, the 2.14 Å-resolution crystal structure of the HDAC8-largazole thiol complex is the first of an HDAC complexed with a macrocyclic inhibitor and reveals that ideal thiolate-zinc coordination geometry is the key chemical feature responsible for its exceptional affinity and biological activity. Notably, the core structure of largazole is conserved in romidepsin, a depsipeptide natural product formulated as the drug Istodax recently approved for cancer chemotherapy. Accordingly, the structure of the HDAC8-largazole thiol complex is the first to illustrate the mode of action of a new class of therapeutically important HDAC inhibitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja205972n

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In HDAC8, the L1 and L2 loops have been shown to display flexibility, being able to change their conformation to adapt to different inhibitors such as the large Largazole inhibitor and its analogues.

    “In HDAC8, the L1 and L2 loops have been shown to display flexibility, being able to change their conformation to adapt to different inhibitors such as the large Largazole inhibitor and its analogues (Figure S7) 40, 41”

    From Characterization of Histone Deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) Selective Inhibition Reveals Specific Active Site Structural and Functional Determinants (2018) · cites this paper as [40]

    The discussion of Fig. 3b describes L1 and L2 loop shifts that accommodate bulky largazole thiol and compares some shifts with those seen for another inhibitor, M344. It discusses largazole analogues, but only suggests that one analogue likely triggers a similar change; it does not show L1 and L2 adapting to largazole analogues. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]De Ruijter AJ van Gennip AH Caron HN Kemp S van Kuilenburg AB Biochem. J 2003 370 737 749 12429021 PMC1223209
  2. [2]Haberland M Montgomery RL Olson EN Nature Rev. Gen 2009 10 32 42 PMC3215088 19065135
  3. [3]Emanuele S Lauricella M Tesoriere G Int. J. Oncol 2008 33 637 646 18813776
  4. [4]Gregoretti IV Lee YM Goodson HV J. Mol. Biol 2004 338 17 31 15050820
  5. [5]Kanyo ZF Scolnick LR Ash DE Christianson DW Nature 1996 383 554 557 8849731
  6. [6]Gantt SL Gattis SG Fierke CA Biochemistry 2006 45 6170 6178 16681389
  7. [7]Mwakwari SC Patil V Guerrant W Oyelere AK Curr. Topics Med. Chem 2010 10 1423 1440 PMC3144151 20536416
  8. [8]Marks PA Wu WS J. Cell. Biochem 2009 107 600 608 19459166 PMC2766855
  9. [9]Lane AA Chabner BA J. Clin. Oncol 2009 27 5459 5468 19826124
  10. [10]Mei S Ho AD Mahlknecht U Int. J. Oncol 2004 25 1509 1519 15547685
  11. [11]Bolden JE Peart MJ Johnstone RW Nature Rev 2006 5 769 784 16955068
  12. [12]Holmes MA Matthews BW Biochemistry 1981 20 6912 6920 7317361
  13. [13]Mann BS Johnson JR Cohen MH Justice R Pazdur R The Oncologist 2007 12 1247 1252 17962618
  14. [14]Guan P Fang H Drug Disc. Ther 2010 4 388 391 22491302
  15. [15]Furumai R Matsuyama A Kobashi N Lee KH Nishiyama M Nakajima H Tanaka A Komatsu Y Nishino N Yoshida M Horinouchi S Cancer Res 2002 62 4916 4921 12208741
  16. [16]Taori K Paul VJ Luesch H J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008 130 1806 1807 18205365
  17. [17]Bowers AA West N Newkirk TL Troutman-Youngman AE Schreiber SL Wiest O Bradner JE Williams RM Org. Lett 2009 11 1301 1304 19239241 PMC2673910
  18. [18]Ying Y Taori K Kim H Hong J Luesch H J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008 130 8455 8459 18507379
  19. [20]Seiser T Kamena F Cramer N Angew. Chem 2008 47 6483 6485 18633950
  20. [21]Dowling DP Gantt SL Gattis SG Fierke CA Christianson DW Biochemistry 2008 47 13554 13563 19053282 PMC2635894
  21. [22]Vannini A Volpari C Gallinari P Jones P Mattu M Carfí A De Francesco R Steinkühler C Di Marco S Embo Rep 2007 8 879 884 2007 17721440 PMC1973954
  22. [23]Chakrabarti P Biochemistry 1989 28 6081 6085 2775752
  23. [24]Zeng X Yin B Hu Z Liao C Liu J Li S Li Z Nicklaus MC Zhou G Jiang S Org. Lett 2010 12 1368 1371 20184338 PMC7386434
  24. [25]Ying Y Liu Y Byeon SR Kim H Luesch H Hong J Org. Lett 2008 10 4021 4024 18707106
  25. [26]Benelkebir H Marie S Hayden AL Lyle J Loadman PM Crabb SJ Packham G Ganesan A Bioorg. Med. Chem 2011 15 3650 3658 21420302

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, K. E., Dowling, D. P., Boone, M. A., Phillips, A. J., & Christianson, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Christianson, David W.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2011-07-26
Volume
133
Issue
32
Pages
12474-12477
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2122863655
Cited by
153
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA110246, R56CA110246, R01CA110246)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM49758, R01GM049758)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P30EB009998)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR012408)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme function and inhibition
Keywords
largazole, HDAC8, histone deacetylase inhibitors, depsipeptides, crystal structure, antiproliferative activity, romidepsin, Symploca, marine cyanobacteria, thioester hydrolysis
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, Models, Molecular, Repressor Proteins, Thiazoles, Crystallography, X-Ray, Depsipeptides, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review