The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cathode Composites for Li–S Batteries via the Use of Oxygenated Porous Architectures
Abstract
Li-S rechargeable batteries are attractive for electric transportation because of their low cost, environmentally friendliness, and superior energy density. However, the Li-S system has yet to conquer the marketplace, owing to its drawbacks, namely, soluble polysulfide formation. To tackle this issue, we present here a strategy based on the use of a mesoporous chromium trimesate metal-organic framework (MOF) named MIL-100(Cr) as host material for sulfur impregnation. Electrodes containing sulfur impregnated within the pores of the MOF were found to show a marked increase in the capacity retention of Li-S cathodes. Complementary transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements demonstrated the reversible capture and release of the polysulfides by the pores of MOF during cycling and evidenced a weak binding between the polysulphides and the oxygenated framework. Such an approach was generalized to other mesoporous oxide structures, such as mesoporous silica, for instance SBA-15, having the same positive effect as the MOF on the capacity retention of Li-S cells. Besides pore sizes, the surface activity of the mesoporous additives, as observed for the MOF, appears to also have a pronounced effect on enhancing the cycle performance. Increased knowledge about the interface between polysulfide species and oxide surfaces could lead to novel approaches in the design and fabrication of long cycle life S electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Self-citationBioMOFs: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Biological and Medical Applications
McKinlay, A. C., Morris, R. E., Horcajada, P., Férey, G., Gref, R., Couvreur, P., & Serre, C. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000048 · Cited by 1,256
Self-citation
Cited by
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Self-citationMetal–organic frameworks as platforms for clean energy
Li, S.-L., & Xu, Q. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40507a · Cited by 970
Metal–organic frameworks as a platform for clean energy applications
Li, X., Yang, X., Xue, H., Pang, H., & Xu, Q. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 · Cited by 706
Metadata
- Authors
- Demir-Cakan, R., Morcrette, M., Nouar, F., Davoisne, C., Devic, T., Gonbeau, D., Dominko, R., Serre, C., Férey, G., & Tarascon, J.-M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-16
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 16154-16160
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1971756711
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.