The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrafast Intramolecular Exciton Splitting Dynamics in Isolated Low-Band-Gap Polymers and Their Implications in Photovoltaic Materials Design
Abstract
Record-setting organic photovoltaic cells with PTB polymers have recently achieved ~8% power conversion efficiencies (PCE). A subset of these polymers, the PTBF series, has a common conjugated backbone with alternating thieno[3,4-b]thiophene and benzodithiophene moieties but differs by the number and position of pendant fluorine atoms attached to the backbone. These electron-withdrawing pendant fluorine atoms fine tune the energetics of the polymers and result in device PCE variations of 2-8%. Using near-IR, ultrafast optical transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy combined with steady-state electrochemical methods we were able to obtain TA signatures not only for the exciton and charge-separated states but also for an intramolecular ("pseudo") charge-transfer state in isolated PTBF polymers in solution, in the absence of the acceptor phenyl-C(61)-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) molecules. This led to the discovery of branched pathways for intramolecular, ultrafast exciton splitting to populate (a) the charge-separated states or (b) the intramolecular charge-transfer states on the subpicosecond time scale. Depending on the number and position of the fluorine pendant atoms, the charge-separation/transfer kinetics and their branching ratios vary according to the trend for the electron density distribution in favor of the local charge-separation direction. More importantly, a linear correlation is found between the branching ratio of intramolecular charge transfer and the charge separation of hole-electron pairs in isolated polymers versus the device fill factor and PCE. The origin of this correlation and its implications in materials design and device performance are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, R., Zhang, C., Li, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Xiao, M. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c04890 · Cited by 474
Jackson, N. E., Savoie, B. M., Kohlstedt, K. L., Olvera de la Cruz, M., Schatz, G. C., Chen, L. X., & Ratner, M. A. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja403667s · Cited by 444
Self-citationLan, Z.-A., Ren, W., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.010 · Cited by 265
Toward Predicting Efficiency of Organic Solar Cells via Machine Learning and Improved Descriptors
Sahu, H., Rao, W., Troisi, A., & Ma, H. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201801032 · Cited by 258
Li, L., Huang, Y., Peng, J., Cao, Y., & Peng, X. (2013) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c2ta00858k · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolczynski, B. S., Szarko, J. M., Son, H. J., Liang, Y., Yu, L., & Chen, L. X.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-22
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4142-4152
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2008025023
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafast Intramolecular Exciton Splitting Dynamics in Isolated Low-Band-Gap Polymers and Their Implications in Photovoltaic Materials Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja209003y
- The paper
- Rolczynski, B. S., Szarko, J. M., Son, H. J., Liang, Y., Yu, L., & Chen, L. X. (2012). Ultrafast Intramolecular Exciton Splitting Dynamics in Isolated Low-Band-Gap Polymers and Their Implications in Photovoltaic Materials Design. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja209003y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.