The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Dispersed Palladium(II) in a Defective Metal–Organic Framework: Application to C–H Activation and Functionalization
Abstract
High reversibility during crystallization leads to relatively defect-free crystals through repair of nonperiodic inclusions, including those derived from impurities. Microporous coordination polymers (MCPs) can achieve a high level of crystallinity through a related mechanism whereby coordination defects are repaired, leading to single crystals. In this work, we discovered and exploited the fact that this process is far from perfect for MCPs and that a minority ligand that is coordinatively identical to but distinct in shape from the majority linker can be inserted into the framework, resulting in defects. The reaction of Zn(II) with 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H(2)BDC) in the presence of small amounts of 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene (H(3)BTB) leads to a new crystalline material, MOF-5(O(h)), that is nearly identical to MOF-5 but has an octahedral morphology and a number of defect sites that are uniquely functionalized with dangling carboxylates. The reaction with Pd(OAc)(2) impregnates the metal ions, creating a heterogeneous catalyst with ultrahigh surface area. The Pd(II)-catalyzed phenylation of naphthalene within Pd-impregnated MOF-5(O(h)) demonstrates the potential utility of an MCP framework for modulating the reactivity and selectivity of such transformations. Furthermore, this novel synthetic approach can be applied to different MCPs and will provide scaffolds functionalized with catalytically active metal species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230444 · Cited by 16,945
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
Kirchon, A., Feng, L., Drake, H. F., Joseph, E. A., & Zhou, H.-C. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00688a · Cited by 1,448
Defect‐Engineered Metal–Organic Frameworks
Fang, Z., Bueken, B., De Vos, D. E., & Fischer, R. A. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201411540 · Cited by 1,252
Stable Metal–Organic Frameworks with Group 4 Metals: Current Status and Trends
Yuan, S., Qin, J.-S., Lollar, C. T., & Zhou, H.-C. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00073 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, T.-H., Hickman, A. J., Koh, K., Martin, S., Wong-Foy, A. G., Sanford, M. S., & Matzger, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-11-28
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 20138-20141
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2318682496
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.