The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Size and Support Effects for the Water–Gas Shift Catalysis over Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Model Al2O3 and TiO2
Abstract
The water-gas shift (WGS) reaction rate per total mole of Au under 7% CO, 8.5% CO(2), 22% H(2)O, and 37% H(2) at 1 atm for Au/Al(2)O(3) catalysts at 180 °C and Au/TiO(2) catalysts at 120 °C varies with the number average Au particle size (d) as d(-2.2±0.2) and d(-2.7±0.1), respectively. The use of nonporous and crystalline, model Al(2)O(3) and TiO(2) supports allowed the imaging of the active catalyst and enabled a precise determination of the Au particle size distribution and particle shape using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Further, the apparent reaction orders and the stretching frequency of CO adsorbed on Au(0) (near 2100 cm(-1)) determined by diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) depend on d. Because of the changes in reaction rates, kinetics, and the CO stretching frequency with number average Au particle size, it is determined that the dominant active sites are the low coordinated corner Au sites, which are 3 and 7 times more active than the perimeter Au sites for Au/Al(2)O(3) and Au/TiO(2) catalysts, respectively, and 10 times more active for Au on TiO(2) versus Al(2)O(3). From operando Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments, it is determined that the active Au sites are metallic in nature. In addition, Au/Al(2)O(3) catalysts have a higher apparent H(2)O order (0.63) and lower apparent activation energy (9 kJ mol(-1)) than Au/TiO(2) catalysts with apparent H(2)O order of -0.42 to -0.21 and activation energy of 45-60 kJ mol(-1) at near 120 °C. From these data, we conclude that the support directly participates by activating H(2)O molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of Active Gold Nanoclusters on Iron Oxide Supports for CO Oxidation
Herzing, A. A., Kiely, C. J., Carley, A. F., Landon, P., & Hutchings, G. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159639 · Cited by 1,530
Cited by
Catalysis by Supported Gold Nanoparticles: Beyond Aerobic Oxidative Processes
Stratakis, M., & Garcia, H. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3000785 · Cited by 803
The critical role of water at the gold-titania interface in catalytic CO oxidation
Saavedra, J., Doan, H. A., Pursell, C. J., Grabow, L. C., & Chandler, B. D. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256018 · Cited by 608
Water gas shift reaction for hydrogen production and carbon dioxide capture: A review
Chen, W.-H., & Chen, C.-Y. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114078 · Cited by 486
Theoretical Heterogeneous Catalysis: Scaling Relationships and Computational Catalyst Design
Greeley, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-034413 · Cited by 409
Xu, M., Yao, S., Rao, D., Niu, Y., Liu, N., Peng, M., Zhai, P., Man, Y., Zheng, L., Wang, B., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03117 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Shekhar, M., Wang, J., Lee, W.-S., Williams, W. D., Kim, S. M., Stach, E. A., Miller, J. T., Delgass, W. N., & Ribeiro, F. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-27
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4700-4708
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1999920344
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.