Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wave Function Engineering for Efficient Extraction of up to Nineteen Electrons from One CdSe/CdS Quasi-Type II Quantum Dot

Zhu, Haiming, Song, Nianhui, Rodríguez-Córdoba, William, Lian, Tianquan·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Solar-to-fuel conversion devices require not only efficient catalysts to accelerate the reactions, but also light harvesting and charge separation components to absorb multiple photons and to deliver multiple electrons/holes to the catalytic centers. In this paper, we show that the spatial distribution of electron and hole wave functions in CdSe/CdS quasi-type II quantum dots enables simultaneous ultrafast charge separation (0.18 ps to adsorbed Methylviologen), ultraslow charge recombination (0.4 μs), and slow multiple-exciton Auger annihilation (biexciton lifetime 440 ps). Up to nineteen excitons per QD can be generated by absorbing multiple 400 nm photons and all excitons can be dissociated with unity yield by electron transfer to adsorbed methylviologen molecules. Our finding demonstrates that (quasi-) type II nanoheterostructures can be engineered to efficiently dissociate multiple excitons and deliver multiple electrons to acceptors, suggesting their potential applications as light harvesting and charge separation components in artificial photosynthetic devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja210312s

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, H., Song, N., Rodríguez-Córdoba, W., & Lian, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-02-27
Volume
134
Issue
9
Pages
4250-4257
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2322111580
Cited by
237
References
1
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.