Cited by 53Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Activated Ribonucleotides Undergo a Sugar Pucker Switch upon Binding to a Single-Stranded RNA Template

Open access
Zhang, Na, Zhang, Shenglong, Szostak, Jack W.·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Template-directed polymerization of chemically activated ribonucleotide monomers, such as nucleotide 5'-phosphorimidazolides, has been studied as a model for nonenzymatic RNA replication during the origin of life. Kinetic studies of the polymerization of various nucleotide monomers on oligonucleotide templates have suggested that the A-form (C3'-endo sugar pucker) conformation is optimal for both monomers and templates for efficient copying. However, RNA monomers are predominantly in the C2'-endo conformation when free in solution, except for cytidine, which is approximately equally distributed between the C2'-endo and C3'-endo conformations. We hypothesized that ribonucleotides undergo a switch in sugar pucker upon binding to an A-type template and that this conformational switch allows or enhances subsequent polymerization. We used transferred nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (TrNOESY), which can be used for specific detection of the bound conformation of small-molecule ligands with relatively weak affinity to receptors, to study the interactions between nucleotide 5'-phosphorimidazolides and single-stranded oligonucleotide templates. We found that the sugar pucker of activated ribonucleotides switches from C2'-endo in the free state to C3'-endo upon binding to an RNA template. This switch occurs only on RNA and not on DNA templates. Furthermore, activated 2'-deoxyribonucleotides maintain a C2'-endo sugar pucker in both the free and template-bound states. Our results provide a structural explanation for the observations that activated ribonucleotides are superior to activated deoxyribonucleotides and that RNA templates are superior to DNA templates in template-directed nonenzymatic primer-extension reactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja212027q

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kozlov I. A.; Orgel L. E. Mol. Biol. 2000, 34, 781. 11153470
  2. Kurz M.; Gobel K.; Hartel C.; Gobel M. W. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 1156.
  3. Kurz M.; Gobel K.; Hartel C.; Gobel M. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 842.
  4. Clore G. M.; Gronenborn A. M. J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 48, 402.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, N., Zhang, S., & Szostak, J. W.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Szostak, Jack W.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-02-03
Volume
134
Issue
8
Pages
3691-3694
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2113825103
Cited by
53
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
sugar pucker, template polymerization, origin of life, A-form RNA, C3'-endo conformation, C2'-endo conformation, primer extension
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Carbohydrates, Models, Molecular, Ribonucleotides, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review