Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synthesis of High-Quality Brookite TiO2 Single-Crystalline Nanosheets with Specific Facets Exposed: Tuning Catalysts from Inert to Highly Reactive

Lin, Haifeng, Li, Liping, Zhao, Minglei, Huang, Xinsong, Chen, Xiaomei, Li, Guangshe, Yu, Richeng·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The brookite phase of TiO(2) is hardly prepared and rarely studied in comparison with the common anatase and rutile phases. In addition, there exist immense controversies over the cognition of the light-induced liveliness of this material. Here, a novel, low-basicity solution chemistry method was first used to prepare homogeneous high-quality brookite TiO(2) single-crystalline nanosheets surrounded with four {210}, two {101}, and two {201} facets. These nanosheets exhibited outstanding activity toward the catalytic degradation of organic contaminants superior even to that of Degussa P25, due to the exposure of high-energy facets and the effective suppression of recombination rates of photogenerated electrons and holes by these facets as the oxidative and reductive sites. In contrast, irregularly faceted phase-pure brookite nanoflowers and nanospindles were inactive in catalytic reactions. These results demonstrate that the photocatalytic activity of brookite TiO(2) is highly dependent upon its exposed facets, which offers a strategy for tuning the catalysts from inert to highly active through tailoring of the morphology and surface structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja3014049

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Lin, H., Li, L., Zhao, M., Huang, X., Chen, X., Li, G., & Yu, R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-05-10
Volume
134
Issue
20
Pages
8328-8331
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2007773236
Cited by
290
References
1
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.