Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photocatalytic Water Splitting Using Modified GaN:ZnO Solid Solution under Visible Light: Long-Time Operation and Regeneration of Activity

Ohno, Tomoyuki, Bai, Lu, Hisatomi, Takashi, Maeda, Kazuhiko, Domen, Kazunari·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Overall water splitting using GaN:ZnO solid solution photocatalyst modified with Rh(2-y)Cr(y)O(3) nanoparticles as H(2) evolution cocatalysts under visible light (400 < λ < 500 nm) was examined with respect to long-term durability and regeneration of photocatalytic activity. The rate of visible light water splitting remained unchanged for 3 months (2160 h), producing H(2) and O(2) continuously at a stoichiometric amount. After 6 months of operation, a 50% loss of the initial activity occurred. Regeneration treatment of deactivated catalysts was attempted by reloading the Rh(2-y)Cr(y)O(3) cocatalyst. The degree of activity regeneration depended on the reloading amount. Up to 80% of the initial activity for H(2) evolution could be recovered under optimal treatment conditions. It was also found that deactivation of GaN:ZnO was suppressed to some extent by prior coloading of an O(2) evolution cocatalyst, which helped to suppress oxidative decomposition of GaN:ZnO by valence band holes, thereby improving the durability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja302479f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ohno, T., Bai, L., Hisatomi, T., Maeda, K., & Domen, K.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-05-02
Volume
134
Issue
19
Pages
8254-8259
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2042352946
Cited by
316
References
0
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.