The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photo-induced Charge Separation across the Graphene–TiO2 Interface Is Faster than Energy Losses: A Time-Domain ab Initio Analysis
Abstract
Graphene-TiO(2) composites exhibit excellent potential for photovoltaic applications, provided that efficient photoinduced charge separation can be achieved at the interface. Once charges are separated, TiO(2) acts as an electron carrier, while graphene is an excellent hole conductor. However, charge separation competes with energy losses that can result in rapid electron-hole annihilation inside metallic graphene. Bearing this in mind, we investigate the mechanisms and, crucially, time scales of electron transfer and energy relaxation processes. Using nonadiabatic molecular dynamics formulated within the framework of time-domain density functional theory, we establish that the photoinduced electron transfer occurs several times faster than the electron-phonon energy relaxation (i.e., charge separation is efficient in the presence of electron-phonon relaxation), thereby showing that graphene-TiO(2) interfaces can form the basis for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices using visible light. We identify the mechanisms for charge separation and energy losses, both of which proceed by rapid, phonon-induced nonadiabatic transitions within the manifold of the electronic states. Electron injection is ultrafast, owing to strong electronic coupling between graphene and TiO(2). Injection is promoted by both out-of-plane graphene motions, which modulate the graphene-TiO(2) distance and interaction, and high-frequency bond stretching and bending vibrations, which generate large nonadiabatic coupling. Both electron injection and energy transfer, injection in particular, accelerate for photoexcited states that are delocalized between the two subsystems. The theoretical results show excellent agreement with the available experimental data [Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3638]. The state-of-the-art simulation generates a detailed time-domain atomistic description of the interfacial charge separation and relaxation processes that are fundamental to a wide variety of applications, including catalysis, electrolysis, and photovoltaics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene
Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., & Lau, C. N. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl0731872 · Cited by 13,823
The surface science of titanium dioxide
Diebold, U. (2003) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-0 · Cited by 7,944
Cited by
25th Anniversary Article: Hybrid Nanostructures Based on Two‐Dimensional Nanomaterials
Huang, X., Tan, C., Yin, Z., & Zhang, H. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201304964 · Cited by 632
Gu, Y., Chen, S., Ren, J., Jia, Y. A., Chen, C., Komarneni, S., Yang, D., & Yao, X. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05971 · Cited by 540
Kapilashrami, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.-S., Hagfeldt, A., & Guo, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5000893 · Cited by 508
Orona-Navar, A., Aguilar-Hernández, I., Nigam, K. D. P., Cerdán-Pasarán, A., & Ornelas-Soto, N. (2021) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.03.013 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, R., English, N. J., & Prezhdo, O. V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-08-21
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 14238-14248
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2329126810
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.