The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New View of Electrochemistry at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite
Abstract
Major new insights on electrochemical processes at graphite electrodes are reported, following extensive investigations of two of the most studied redox couples, Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) and Ru(NH(3))(6)(3+/2+). Experiments have been carried out on five different grades of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) that vary in step-edge height and surface coverage. Significantly, the same electrochemical characteristic is observed on all surfaces, independent of surface quality: initial cyclic voltammetry (CV) is close to reversible on freshly cleaved surfaces (>400 measurements for Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) and >100 for Ru(NH(3))(6)(3+/2+)), in marked contrast to previous studies that have found very slow electron transfer (ET) kinetics, with an interpretation that ET only occurs at step edges. Significantly, high spatial resolution electrochemical imaging with scanning electrochemical cell microscopy, on the highest quality mechanically cleaved HOPG, demonstrates definitively that the pristine basal surface supports fast ET, and that ET is not confined to step edges. However, the history of the HOPG surface strongly influences the electrochemical behavior. Thus, Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) shows markedly diminished ET kinetics with either extended exposure of the HOPG surface to the ambient environment or repeated CV measurements. In situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) reveals that the deterioration in apparent ET kinetics is coupled with the deposition of material on the HOPG electrode, while conducting-AFM highlights that, after cleaving, the local surface conductivity of HOPG deteriorates significantly with time. These observations and new insights are not only important for graphite, but have significant implications for electrochemistry at related carbon materials such as graphene and carbon nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene-based nanomaterials and their electrochemistry
Pumera, M. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c002690p · Cited by 1,117
Cited by
The edge- and basal-plane-specific electrochemistry of a single-layer graphene sheet
Yuan, W., Zhou, Y., Li, Y., Li, C., Peng, H., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Dai, L., & Shi, G. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02248 · Cited by 527
Electrochemistry of Nanoparticles
Kleijn, S. E. F., Lai, S. C. S., Koper, M. T. M., & Unwin, P. R. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201306828 · Cited by 398
Self-citationEbejer, N., Güell, A. G., Lai, S. C. S., McKelvey, K., Snowden, M. E., & Unwin, P. R. (2013) · Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-anchem-062012-092650 · Cited by 355
Self-citationZhang, W., Zhu, S., Luque, R., Han, S., Hu, L., & Xu, G. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00297d · Cited by 313
Highly Efficient Laser Scribed Graphene Electrodes for On‐Chip Electrochemical Sensing Applications
Nayak, P., Kurra, N., Xia, C., & Alshareef, H. N. (2016) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.201600185 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Patel, A. N., Collignon, M. G., O’Connell, M. A., Hung, W. O. Y., McKelvey, K., Macpherson, J. V., & Unwin, P. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-12-03
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 20117-20130
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2124743354
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.