The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanistic Studies of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction Mediated by a Nickel–Borate Thin Film Electrocatalyst
Abstract
A critical determinant of solar-driven water splitting efficiency is the kinetic profile of the O2 evolving catalyst (OEC). We now report the kinetic profiles of water splitting by a self-assembled nickel-borate (NiBi) OEC. Mechanistic studies of anodized films of NiBi exhibit the low Tafel slope of 2.3 × RT/2F (30 mV/decade at 25 °C). This Tafel slope together with an inverse third order rate dependence on H(+) activity establishes NiBi as an ideal catalyst to be used in the construction of photoelectrochemical devices for water splitting. In contrast, nonanodized NiBi films display significantly poorer activity relative to their anodized congeners that we attribute to a more sluggish electron transfer from the catalyst resting state. Borate is shown to play two ostensibly antagonistic roles in OEC activity: as a promulgator of catalyst activity by enabling proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) and as an inhibitor in its role as an adsorbate of active sites. By defining the nature of the PCET pre-equilibrium that occurs during turnover, trends in catalyst activity may be completely reversed at intermediate pH as compared to those at pH extremes. These results highlight the critical role of PCET pre-equilibria in catalyst self-assembly and turnover, and accordingly suggest a reassessment in how OEC activities of different catalysts are compared and rationalized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces
Man, I. C., Su, H., Calle‐Vallejo, F., Hansen, H. A., Martínez, J. I., Inoglu, N. G., Kitchin, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Nørskov, J. K., & Rossmeisl, J. (2011) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000397 · Cited by 4,769
Photosynthetic energy conversion: natural and artificial
Barber, J. (2009) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b802262n · Cited by 1,843
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Cited by
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting
Roger, I., Shipman, M. A., & Symes, M. D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-016-0003 · Cited by 3,503
Transition‐Metal (Co, Ni, and Fe)‐Based Electrocatalysts for the Water Oxidation Reaction
Han, L., Dong, S., & Wang, E. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602270 · Cited by 1,769
Recent Progress on Multimetal Oxide Catalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Kim, J. S., Kim, B., Kim, H., & Kang, K. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201702774 · Cited by 940
Chen, S., Duan, J., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201305608 · Cited by 658
Metadata
- Authors
- Bediako, D. K., Surendranath, Y., & Nocera, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-02-20
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3662-3674
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2323651114
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.