The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfluidic Approach toward Continuous and Ultrafast Synthesis of Metal–Organic Framework Crystals and Hetero Structures in Confined Microdroplets
Open accessAbstract
Herein, we report a novel nanoliter droplet-based microfluidic strategy for continuous and ultrafast synthesis of metal-organic framework (MOF) crystals and MOF heterostructures. Representative MOF structures, such as HKUST-1, MOF-5, IRMOF-3, and UiO-66, were synthesized within a few minutes via solvothermal reactions with substantially faster kinetics in comparison to the conventional batch processes. The approach was successfully extended to the preparation of a demanding Ru3BTC2 structure that requires high-pressure hydrothermal synthesis conditions. Finally, three different types of core-shell MOF composites, i.e., Co3BTC2@Ni3BTC2, MOF-5@diCH3-MOF-5, and Fe3O4@ZIF-8, were synthesized by exploiting a unique two-step integrated microfluidic synthesis scheme in a continuous-flow mode. The synthesized MOF crystals were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and BET surface area measurements. In comparison with bare MOF-5, MOF-5@diCH3-MOF-5 showed enhanced structural stability in the presence of moisture, and the catalytic performance of Fe3O4@ZIF-8 was examined using Knoevenagel condensation as a probe reaction. The microfluidic strategy allowed continuous fabrication of high-quality MOF crystals and composites exhibiting distinct morphological characteristics in a time-efficient manner and represents a viable alternative to the time-consuming and multistep MOF synthesis processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
Cited by
New synthetic routes towards MOF production at scale
Rubio-Martinez, M., Avci-Camur, C., Thornton, A. W., Imaz, I., Maspoch, D., & Hill, M. R. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00109f · Cited by 990
ZIF-8: A comparison of synthesis methods
Lee, Y.-R., Jang, M.-S., Cho, H.-Y., Kwon, H.-J., Kim, S., & Ahn, W.-S. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.094 · Cited by 849
Self-citationMOF positioning technology and device fabrication
Falcaro, P., Ricco, R., Doherty, C. M., Liang, K., Hill, A. J., & Styles, M. J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00089g · Cited by 710
Dai, H., Yuan, X., Jiang, L., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., & Xiong, T. (2021) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213985 · Cited by 503
Cheng, N., Ren, L., Xu, X., Du, Y., & Dou, S. X. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201801257 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Faustini, M., Kim, J., Jeong, G.-Y., Kim, J. Y., Moon, H. R., Ahn, W.-S., & Kim, D.-P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-18
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 14619-14626
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2005588386
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.