The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanistic Insights and Kinetic Analysis for the Oxidative Hydroxylation of Arylboronic Acids by Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis: A Metal-Free Alternative
Abstract
The photocatalytic hydroxylation of boronic acids with methylene blue as photosensitizer proceeds with high efficiency. Detailed time-resolved studies of the relevant rate constants provide a clear mechanistic understanding of excited-state processes and guided the selection of the photocatalyst and the optimization of experimental conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prier, C. K., Rankic, D. A., & MacMillan, D. W. C. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300503r · Cited by 9,590
Cited by
Metal-Free Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization
Treat, N. J., Sprafke, H., Kramer, J. W., Clark, P. G., Barton, B. E., Read de Alaniz, J., Fors, B. P., & Hawker, C. J. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja510389m · Cited by 939
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitre, S. P., McTiernan, C. D., Ismaili, H., & Scaiano, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-08-26
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 13286-13289
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2331363712
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
