The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tailored Donor–Acceptor Polymers with an A–D1–A–D2 Structure: Controlling Intermolecular Interactions to Enable Enhanced Polymer Photovoltaic Devices
Open accessAbstract
Extensive efforts have been made to develop novel conjugated polymers that give improved performance in organic photovoltaic devices. The use of polymers based on alternating electron-donating and electron-accepting units not only allows the frontier molecular orbitals to be tuned to maximize the open-circuit voltage of the devices but also controls the optical band gap to increase the number of photons absorbed and thus modifies the other critical device parameter-the short circuit current. In fact, varying the nonchromophoric components of a polymer is often secondary to the efforts to adjust the intermolecular aggregates and improve the charge-carrier mobility. Here, we introduce an approach to polymer synthesis that facilitates simultaneous control over both the structural and electronic properties of the polymers. Through the use of a tailored multicomponent acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) intermediate, polymers with the unique structure A-D1-A-D2 can be prepared. This approach enables variations in the donor fragment substituents such that control over both the polymer regiochemistry and solubility is possible. This control results in improved intermolecular π-stacking interactions and therefore enhanced charge-carrier mobility. Solar cells using the A-D1-A-D2 structural polymer show short-circuit current densities that are twice that of the simple, random analogue while still maintaining an identical open-circuit voltage. The key finding of this work is that polymers with an A-D1-A-D2 structure offer significant performance benefits over both regioregular and random A-D polymers. The chemical synthesis approach that enables the preparation of A-D1-A-D2 polymers therefore represents a promising new route to materials for high-efficiency organic photovoltaic devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yiu, A. T., Beaujuge, P. M., Lee, O. P., Woo, C. H., Toney, M. F., & Fréchet, J. M. J. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2089662 · Cited by 491
Cited by
A molecular nematic liquid crystalline material for high-performance organic photovoltaics
Sun, K., Xiao, Z., Lu, S., Zajaczkowski, W., Pisula, W., Hanssen, E., White, J. M., Williamson, R. M., Subbiah, J., Ouyang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7013 · Cited by 630
Self-citationYao, J., Yu, C., Liu, Z., Luo, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, G., & Zhang, D. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b09737 · Cited by 316
Chen, S., Xiao, L., Zhu, X., Peng, X., Wong, W.-K., & Wong, W.-Y. (2015) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c5cc05807d · Cited by 69
Cuesta, V., Vartanian, M., Cruz, P. D. L., Singhal, R., Sharma, G. D., & Langa, F. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta09408b · Cited by 59
Morán, G., Arrechea, S., Cruz, P. D. L., Cuesta, V., Biswas, S., Palomares, E., Sharma, G. D., & Langa, F. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta04369k · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, T., Zajaczkowski, W., Pisula, W., Baumgarten, M., Chen, M., Gao, M., Wilson, G., Easton, C. D., Müllen, K., & Watkins, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-14
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6049-6055
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2090185857
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.