CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative study on the photovoltaic characteristics of A–D–A and D–A–D molecules based on Zn-porphyrin; a D–A–D molecule with over 8.0% efficiency

Cuesta, Virginia, Vartanian, Maida, Cruz, Pilar de la, Singhal, Rahul, Sharma, Ganesh D., Langa, Fernando·2017·Journal of Materials Chemistry A
DOI 10.1039/c6ta09408b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Devices based on two symmetrical molecules with A–D–A and D–A–D structures and PC 71 BM show remarkable PCE values of 7.04% and 8.03%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6ta09408b

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Active layers showed fine phase separation between PC71BM and porphyrin domains.

    “Active layers showed  ne phase separation between the PC71BM and the porphyrin domains.”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [92]

  • TEM measurements indicated black and white domains corresponding to PC71BM-rich and porphyrin-rich regions, respectively.

    “Transmission electron microscopy measurements indicated the presence of black and white domains corresponding to the PC71BM-rich and porphyrin-rich regions, respectively.”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [92]

  • The F4:PC71BM device showed a high efficiency of 8.03%.

    “the F4 :PC71BM device showed a high e ffi ciency of 8.03%.”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [92]

  • This higher efficiency was due to the high FF and Jsc resulting from the low energy loss, the balanced charge transport and the optimized morphology of the blend.

    “This higher e ffi ciency was due to the high FF and J sc resulting from the low energy loss, the balanced charge transport and the optimized morphology of the blend.”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [92]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Li, 2012, Nat. Photonics, 6, 153, 10.1038/nphoton.2012.11 · DOI
  2. Wright, 2012, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 107, 87, 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.07.006 · DOI
  3. Krebs, 2014, Adv. Mater., 26, 29, 10.1002/adma.201302031 · DOI
  4. Wu, 2015, Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, 1113, 10.1039/C4CS00250D · DOI
  5. Yu, 1995, Science, 270, 1789, 10.1126/science.270.5243.1789 · DOI
  6. Emmott, 2015, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 1317, 10.1039/C4EE03132F · DOI
  7. Po, 2014, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 925, 10.1039/c3ee43460e · DOI
  8. Polman, 2016, Science, 352, 4424, 10.1126/science.aad4424 · DOI
  9. Li, 2012, Acc. Chem. Res., 45, 723, 10.1021/ar2002446 · DOI
  10. Yao, 2016, Chem. Rev., 116, 7397, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00176 · DOI
  11. Lu, 2015, Chem. Rev., 115, 12666, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00098 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2013, Acc. Chem. Res., 46, 2645, 10.1021/ar400088c · DOI
  13. Coughlin, 2014, Acc. Chem. Res., 47, 257, 10.1021/ar400136b · DOI
  14. Ni, 2015, Chem. Commun., 51, 4939
  15. Fan, 2015, Sci. China: Chem., 58, 922, 10.1007/s11426-015-5418-6 · DOI
  16. He, 2015, Nat. Photonics, 9, 174, 10.1038/nphoton.2015.6 · DOI
  17. Ouyang, 2015, Nat. Photonics, 9, 520, 10.1038/nphoton.2015.126 · DOI
  18. Zhao, 2016, Nat. Energy, 1, 15027, 10.1038/nenergy.2015.27 · DOI
  19. Liu, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 5293, 10.1038/ncomms6293 · DOI
  20. Zhao, 2016, Adv. Mater., 10.1002/adma.201604059 · DOI
  21. Li, 2015, Adv. Mater., 27, 6296, 10.1002/adma.201502645 · DOI
  22. Lim, 2014, Chem. Mater., 26, 2283, 10.1021/cm5004092 · DOI
  23. Lan, 2014, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6, 9298, 10.1021/am501659u · DOI
  24. Cui, 2015, Adv. Mater., 27, 7469, 10.1002/adma.201503815 · DOI
  25. Kan, 2015, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137, 3886, 10.1021/jacs.5b00305 · DOI
  26. Li, 2015, Sci. China: Chem., 58, 191, 10.1007/s11426-014-5311-8 · DOI
  27. Liu, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 3356, 10.1038/srep03356 · DOI
  28. Yuan, 2013, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 622, 10.1039/C2CS35313J · DOI
  29. Alexy, 2014, Chem. Commun., 50, 14512, 10.1039/C4CC06853J · DOI
  30. Currie, 2008, Science, 321, 226, 10.1126/science.1158342 · DOI
  31. Mathew, 2014, Nat. Chem., 6, 242, 10.1038/nchem.1861 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hatano, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 19258, 10.1039/c2jm33956k · DOI · Paper page
  33. Sharma, 2013, Org. Electron., 14, 1811, 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.03.023 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kumar, 2015, Nanoscale, 7, 179, 10.1039/C4NR05565A · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sharma, 2014, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 5968, 10.1021/jp500090h · DOI · Paper page
  36. Chen, 2015, Chem. Commun., 51, 14439, 10.1039/C5CC05807D · DOI · Paper page
  37. Arrechea, 2015, Dyes Pigm., 121, 109, 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.04.037 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Montcada, 2016, Org. Electron., 38, 330, 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Wang, 2016, Chem. Sci., 7, 4301, 10.1039/C5SC04783H · DOI
  40. Gao, 2016, Adv. Mater., 28, 4727, 10.1002/adma.201505645 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kesters, 2015, Adv. Energy Mater., 1500218, 10.1002/aenm.201500218 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mei, 2010, Org. Lett., 12, 660, 10.1021/ol902512x · DOI
  43. Steinberger, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 1982, 10.1039/c0cc04541a · DOI
  44. Fitzner, 2012, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 11064, 10.1021/ja302320c · DOI
  45. Li, 2012, Adv. Energy Mater., 2, 74, 10.1002/aenm.201100572 · DOI
  46. Zhou, 2012, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 16345, 10.1021/ja306865z · DOI
  47. Leliège, 2011, Org. Lett., 13, 3098, 10.1021/ol201002j · DOI
  48. Li, 2012, Adv. Energy Mater., 2, 74, 10.1002/aenm.201100572 · DOI
  49. Walker, 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 3063, 10.1002/adfm.200900832 · DOI
  50. Zitzler-Kunkel, 2014, Adv. Funct. Mater., 24, 4645, 10.1002/adfm.201400455 · DOI
  51. Hendriks, 2013, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 52, 8341, 10.1002/anie.201302319 · DOI
  52. Zou, 2009, Macromolecules, 42, 2891, 10.1021/ma900364c · DOI
  53. Huang, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 21841, 10.1039/c2jm34429g · DOI · Paper page
  54. Würthner, 2011, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 50, 3376, 10.1002/anie.201002307 · DOI
  55. Zengqi Xie, 2015, Mater. Horiz., 2, 514, 10.1039/C5MH00056D · DOI
  56. Qin, 2014, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 6049, 10.1021/ja500935d · DOI
  57. Veldman, 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 1939, 10.1002/adfm.200900090 · DOI
  58. Walker, 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 3063, 10.1002/adfm.200900832 · DOI
  59. Gao, 2014, Adv. Mater., 26, 3142, 10.1002/adma.201305645 · DOI
  60. Zhang, 2013, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 8270, 10.1039/c3ta11001j · DOI
  61. Carsten, 2011, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 33, 20468, 10.1021/ja208642b · DOI
  62. Zhang, 2011, Adv. Energy Mater., 1, 923, 10.1002/aenm.201100304 · DOI
  63. Carsten, 2012, Macromolecules, 45, 6390, 10.1021/ma3011119 · DOI
  64. Albrecht, 2014, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5, 1131, 10.1021/jz500457b · DOI
  65. Zhang, 2016, Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 1600323, 10.1002/admi.201600323 · DOI
  66. Cowan, 2011, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 83, 035205, 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035205 · DOI
  67. Mandoc, 2007, Adv. Funct. Mater., 17, 2167, 10.1002/adfm.200601110 · DOI
  68. Hecht, 1932, Z. Phys., 77, 235, 10.1007/BF01338917 · DOI
  69. Mihailetchi, 2006, Adv. Funct. Mater., 16, 699, 10.1002/adfm.200500420 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Mao, 2014, Org. Electron., 15, 3384, 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cuesta, V., Vartanian, M., Cruz, P. D. L., Singhal, R., Sharma, G. D., & Langa, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
  • Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
  • Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur (IN)
  • LNM Institute of Information Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Sharma, Ganesh D.
  • Langa, Fernando
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2017
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
1057-1065
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
DOI
10.1039/c6ta09408b
OpenAlex
W2557879842
Cited by
59
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Materials Chemistry A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Keywords
zinc porphyrin, organic solar cells, PC71BM, power conversion efficiency, donor-acceptor molecules, photovoltaic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review