The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How are Radicals (Re)Generated in Photochemical ATRP?
Abstract
The polymerization mechanism of photochemically mediated Cu-based atom-transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was investigated using both experimental and kinetic modeling techniques. There are several distinct pathways that can lead to photochemical (re)generation of Cu(I) activator species or formation of radicals. These (re)generation pathways include direct photochemical reduction of the Cu(II) complexes by excess free amine moieties and unimolecular reduction of the Cu(II) complex, similar to activators regenerated by electron-transfer (ARGET) ATRP processes. Another pathway is photochemical radical generation either directly from the alkyl halide, ligand, or via interaction of ligand with either monomer or with alkyl halides. These photochemical radical generation processes are similar to initiators for continuous activator regeneration (ICAR) ATRP processes. A series of model experiments, ATRP reactions, and kinetic simulations were performed to evaluate the contribution of these reactions to the photochemical ATRP process. The results of these studies indicate that the dominant radical (re)generation reaction is the photochemical reduction of Cu(II) complexes by free amines moieties (from amine containing ligands). The unimolecular reduction of the Cu(II) deactivator complex is not significant, however, there is some contribution from ICAR ATRP reactions involving the interaction of alkyl halides and ligand, ligand with monomer, and the photochemical cleavage of the alkyl halide. Therefore, the mechanism of photochemically mediated ATRP is consistent with a photochemical ARGET ATRP reaction dominating the radical (re)generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prier, C. K., Rankic, D. A., & MacMillan, D. W. C. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300503r · Cited by 9,590
SZWARC, M. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/1781168a0 · Cited by 1,360
Cited by
Light-Controlled Radical Polymerization: Mechanisms, Methods, and Applications
Chen, M., Zhong, M., & Johnson, J. A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00671 · Cited by 1,202
Electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization (eATRP)
Chmielarz, P., Fantin, M., Park, S., Isse, A. A., Gennaro, A., Magenau, A. J. D., Sobkowiak, A., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2017) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.02.005 · Cited by 355
Self-citationMiyake, G. M., & Theriot, J. C. (2014) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma502044f · Cited by 351
Pearson, R. M., Lim, C.-H., McCarthy, B. G., Musgrave, C. B., & Miyake, G. M. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b08068 · Cited by 339
Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization: A Mechanistic Perspective
Lorandi, F., Fantin, M., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c05364 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ribelli, T. G., Konkolewicz, D., Bernhard, S., & Matyjaszewski, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-09-15
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 13303-13312
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2328404902
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.