The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Backbone−Solvent Interactions in Determining Conformational Equilibria of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are functional proteins that do not fold into well-defined three-dimensional structures under physiological conditions. IDP sequences have low hydrophobicity, and hence, recent experiments have focused on quantitative studies of conformational ensembles of archetypal IDP sequences such as polyglutamine and glycine-serine block copolypeptides. Results from these experiments show that, despite the absence of hydrophobic residues, polar IDPs prefer ensembles of collapsed structures in aqueous milieus. Do these preferences originate in interactions that are unique to polar sidechains? The current study addresses this issue by analyzing conformational equilibria for polyglycine and a glycine-serine block copolypeptide in two environments, namely, water and 8 M urea. Polyglycine, a poly secondary-amide, has no sidechains and is a useful model system for generic polypeptide backbones. Results based on large-scale molecular dynamics simulations show that polyglycine forms compact, albeit disordered, globules in water and swollen, disordered coils in 8 M urea. There is minimal overlap between conformational ensembles in the two environments. Analysis of order parameters derived from theories for flexible polymers show that water at ambient temperatures is a poor solvent for generic polypeptide backbones. Therefore, the experimentally observed preferences for polyglutamine and glycine-serine block copolypeptides must originate, at least partially, in polypeptide backbones. A preliminary analysis of the driving forces that lead to distinct conformational preferences for polyglycine in two different environments is presented. Implications for describing conformational ensembles of generic IDP sequences are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions
Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1589 · Cited by 3,871
Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function
Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M., & Obradović, Z. (2002) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi012159+ · Cited by 1,731
Cited by
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions
Oldfield, C. J., & Dunker, A. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164947 · Cited by 1,057
Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins
Dunker, A. K., Silman, I., Uversky, V. N., & Sussman, J. L. (2008) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.10.002 · Cited by 963
Introducing Protein Intrinsic Disorder
Habchi, J., Tompa, P., Longhi, S., & Uversky, V. N. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400514h · Cited by 756
Lemkul, J. A., Huang, J., Roux, B., & MacKerell, A. D. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00505 · Cited by 623
Hua, L., Zhou, R., Thirumalai, D., & Berne, B. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808427105 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Tran, H. T., Mao, A., & Pappu, R. V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-05-16
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7380-7392
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2041774584
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.