The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relation between the Ion Size and Pore Size for an Electric Double-Layer Capacitor
Open accessAbstract
The research on electrochemical double layer capacitors (EDLC), also known as supercapacitors or ultracapacitors, is quickly expanding because their power delivery performance fills the gap between dielectric capacitors and traditional batteries. However, many fundamental questions, such as the relations between the pore size of carbon electrodes, ion size of the electrolyte, and the capacitance have not yet been fully answered. We show that the pore size leading to the maximum double-layer capacitance of a TiC-derived carbon electrode in a solvent-free ethyl-methylimmidazolium-bis(trifluoro-methane-sulfonyl)imide (EMI-TFSI) ionic liquid is roughly equal to the ion size (approximately 0.7 nm). The capacitance values of TiC-CDC produced at 500 degrees C are more than 160 F/g and 85 F/cm(3) at 60 degrees C, while standard activated carbons with larger pores and a broader pore size distribution present capacitance values lower than 100 F/g and 50 F/cm(3) in ionic liquids. A significant drop in capacitance has been observed in pores that were larger or smaller than the ion size by just an angstrom, suggesting that the pore size must be tuned with sub-angstrom accuracy when selecting a carbon/ion couple. This work suggests a general approach to EDLC design leading to the maximum energy density, which has been now proved for both solvated organic salts and solvent-free liquid electrolytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon materials for chemical capacitive energy storage
Zhai, Y., Dou, Y., Zhao, D., Fulvio, P. F., Mayes, R. T., & Dai, S. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201100984 · Cited by 2,964
Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors
Salanne, M., Rotenberg, B., Naoi, K., Kaneko, K., Taberna, P.-L., Grey, C. P., Dunn, B., & Simon, P. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.70 · Cited by 2,181
Self-citationHou, J., Cao, C., Idrees, F., & Ma, X. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn506394r · Cited by 1,529
Electrolyte selection for supercapacitive devices: a critical review
Pal, B., Yang, S., Ramesh, S., Thangadurai, V., & Jose, R. (2019) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/c9na00374f · Cited by 1,317
Wang, Q., Yan, J., & Fan, Z. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee03109e · Cited by 1,225
Metadata
- Authors
- Largeot, C., Portet, C., Chmiola, J., Taberna, P.-L., Gogotsi, Y., & Simon, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-08
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2730-2731
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2075550639
- Cited by
- 2,445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between the Ion Size and Pore Size for an Electric Double-Layer Capacitor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja7106178
- The paper
- Largeot, C., Portet, C., Chmiola, J., Taberna, P.-L., Gogotsi, Y., & Simon, P. (2008). Relation between the Ion Size and Pore Size for an Electric Double-Layer Capacitor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja7106178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.