The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Giant” Multishell CdSe Nanocrystal Quantum Dots with Suppressed Blinking
Open accessAbstract
Semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots (NQDs) comprise an important class of inorganic fluorophores for applications from optoelectronics to biology. Unfortunately, to date, NQD optical properties (e.g., their efficient and particle-size-tunable photoluminescence) have been susceptible to instabilities at the bulk and single-particle levels. Specifically, ensemble quantum yields (QYs) in emission are dependent upon NQD surface chemistry and chemical environment, while at the single-particle level, NQDs are characterized by significant fluorescence intermittency (blinking) that hinders applications as single-photon light sources for quantum informatics and biolabels for real-time monitoring of single biomolecules. Furthermore, while NQDs are significantly more photostable than their organic dye counterparts, traditional NQDs photobleach over periods of seconds to many minutes. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that by encapsulating the NQD core in a sufficiently thick inorganic shell, we are able to divorce NQD function from NQD surface chemistry and chemical environment. We show that our "giant" NQDs (g-NQDs) are functionally distinct from standard core-only, core/shell and even core/multishell NQDs. g-NQDs are substantially less sensitive to changes in surface chemistry. They do not photobleach under continuous laser excitation over periods of several hours repeated over several days, and they exhibit markedly different blinking behavior; >20% of the g-NQDs do not blink, while >40% have on-time fractions of >80%. All of these observations are in stark contrast with control samples comprising core-only and standard, thinner core/multishell NQDs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Cited by
SERS Nanoparticles in Medicine: From Label-Free Detection to Spectroscopic Tagging
Lane, L. A., Qian, X., & Nie, S. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00265 · Cited by 873
Colloidal heterostructured nanocrystals: Synthesis and growth mechanisms
Carbone, L., & Cozzoli, P. D. (2010) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.006 · Cited by 691
Fluorescent Polymer Nanoparticles Based on Dyes: Seeking Brighter Tools for Bioimaging
Reisch, A., & Klymchenko, A. S. (2016) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201503396 · Cited by 634
Bae, W. K., Padilha, L. A., Park, Y.-S., McDaniel, H., Robel, I., Pietryga, J. M., & Klimov, V. I. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4002825 · Cited by 508
Self-citationColloidal quantum dot electronics
Liu, M., Yazdani, N., Yarema, M., Jansen, M., Wood, V., & Sargent, E. H. (2021) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00632-7 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Vela, J., Htoon, H., Casson, J. L., Werder, D. J., Bussian, D. A., Klimov, V. I., & Hollingsworth, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-20
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5026-5027
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2009638928
- Cited by
- 957
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.