The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transition-Metal Nanocluster Size vs Formation Time and the Catalytically Effective Nucleus Number: A Mechanism-Based Treatment
Abstract
A mechanism-based equation for the size of a forming transition-metal nanocluster vs time has been derived based on the Finke-Watzky two-step mechanism for transition-metal nanocluster nucleation (A --> B, rate constant k1) and autocatalytic growth (A + B --> 2B, rate constant k2), where A is the nanocluster precursor and B is the growing nanocluster. The resultant equation expresses nanocluster diameter as a function of time, D(t), in terms of k1, k2, the initial concentration of the nanocluster precursor complex, [A]0, and the number of catalytically effective nuclei derived from either (i) the final nanocluster size, D(f), or (ii) the number of atoms in the average catalytically effective nucleus, N*, and the induction period time, t ind (N* being by definition the number of atoms present in the average size nucleus at the end of the induction period and when observable catalysis begins). By fitting experimentally determined nanocluster size vs time data using this equation, evidence for the validity of the equation is obtained for Ir(0) nanoclusters formed from the well-studied system of H2 reduction of the precursor [(1,5-COD)Ir x P2W15Nb3O62](8-). The D(t) equation is then used to determine N* for nine prior Ir(0) nanocluster preparations from five different [(1,5-COD)Ir(+)]n [anion(n-)] precursors. Also given is a relationship allowing one to interconvert between nanocluster size data and nanocluster precursor concentration data, again when the two-step nucleation and growth mechanism has been shown to apply. Some of the key experimental factors that are known to affect the kinetics of nanocluster formation, and therefore nanocluster size, are also summarized. A look ahead to needed future work is also provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kinetische Behandlung der Keimbildung in übersättigten Dämpfen
Becker, R., & Döring, W. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160806 · Cited by 3,155
Özkar, S., & Finke, R. G. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja012749v · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Cited by
Mechanisms of Nucleation and Growth of Nanoparticles in Solution
Thanh, N. T. K., Maclean, N., & Mahiddine, S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400544s · Cited by 3,399
Synthesis and properties of colloidal heteronanocrystals
Donegá, C. D. M. (2011) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c0cs00055h · Cited by 719
Kinetics and Mechanisms of Aggregative Nanocrystal Growth
Wang, F., Richards, V. N., Shields, S. P., & Buhro, W. E. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm402139r · Cited by 560
Bentea, L., Watzky, M. A., & Finke, R. G. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12021 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Watzky, M. A., Finney, E. E., & Finke, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-16
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 11959-11969
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2013579540
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.