The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
Abstract
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and ultrashort SWCNTs (US-SWCNTs) were functionalized with derivatives of the phenolic antioxidant, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). By using the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay, the oxygen radical scavenging ability of the SWCNT antioxidants is nearly 40 times greater than that of the radioprotective dendritic fullerene, DF-1. In addition, ORAC results revealed two divergent trends in the antioxidant potential of SWCNTs, depending on the type of functionalization employed. When existing pendant sites on US-SWCNTs were further functionalized by either covalent or noncovalent interactions of the existing pendant sites with a BHT derivative, the amount of BHT-derivative loading proportionately increased the overall antioxidant activity. If, however, functionalization occurred via covalent functionalization of a BHT-derivative directly to the SWCNT sidewall, the amount of BHT-derivative loading was inversely proportional to the overall antioxidant activity. Therefore, increasing the number of pendant sites on the SWCNT sidewalls by covalent functionalization led to a concomitant reduction in ORAC activity, suggesting that the nanotube itself is a better radical scavenger than the BHT-derivatized SWCNT. Cytotoxicity assays showed that both nonfunctionalized and BHT-derivatized SWCNTs have little or no deleterious effect on cell viability. Therefore, SWCNTs may be attractive agents for antioxidant materials and medical therapeutics research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Cited by
Antioxidant chemistry of graphene-based materials and its role in oxidation protection technology
Qiu, Y., Wang, Z., Owens, A. C. E., Kulaots, I., Chen, Y., Kane, A. B., & Hurt, R. H. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c4nr03275f · Cited by 481
Lee, S. S., Song, W., Cho, M., Puppala, H. L., Nguyen, P., Zhu, H., Segatori, L., & Colvin, V. L. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4026806 · Cited by 414
Reactive Oxygen Species‐Regulating Strategies Based on Nanomaterials for Disease Treatment
Zhang, C., Wang, X., Du, J., Gu, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202002797 · Cited by 401
Molybdenum-based nanoclusters act as antioxidants and ameliorate acute kidney injury in mice
Ni, D., Jiang, D., Kutyreff, C. J., Lai, J., Yan, Y., Barnhart, T. E., Yu, B., Im, H.-J., Kang, L., Cho, S. Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07890-8 · Cited by 313
Kuempel, E. D., Jaurand, M.-C., Møller, P., Morimoto, Y., Kobayashi, N., Pinkerton, K. E., Sargent, L. M., Vermeulen, R. C. H., Fubini, B., & Kane, A. B. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408444.2016.1206061 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucente-Schultz, R. M., Moore, V. C., Leonard, A. D., Price, B. K., Kosynkin, D. V., Lu, M., Partha, R., Conyers, J. L., & Tour, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-02-25
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3934-3941
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2021427002
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.