Cited by 68RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsOrigins and Evolution of LifeDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Rapid and simple ribozymic aminoacylation using three conserved nucleotides

Open access
Chumachenko, N. V., Novikov, Y., Yarus, M.·2009·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Selection-amplification finds new RNA enzymes (ribozymes) among randomized RNAs with flanking unvaried sequences (primer complements). Precise removal of 3'-primer before reaction selected aminoacylation from PheAMP in three cycles, yielding active RNAs (k(cat) = 12-20 min(-1)) using only three conserved nucleotides, acting independently of divalent ions. This unusually simple RNA active site encouraged study of the reaction via molecular mechanics-based free energy minimization. On this basis, we suggest a chemical path for RNA-catalyzed transaminoacylation. Site modeling also predicted new features, L-stereoselectivity, 2'-regioselectivity, independence of amino acid side chain, and phosphorylated activating group, that were subsequently verified. The same selection also showed that RNA aminoacylation from adenylate is simpler than from CoA thioester, potentially rationalizing translational activation by adenylates. The simplicity of this active site suggests a general route to small ribozymes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja809419f

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since ligation does not require a long ribozyme sequence, it is template binding and daughter-strand separation that necessitate the help of more complex and longer RNA polymerase ribozymes.

    “Since ligation does not require a long ribozyme sequence [108], it is template binding and daughter-strand separation that necessitate the help of more complex and longer RNA polymerase ribozymes.”

    From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Selection scheme describes ligating an oligonucleotide to selected RNAs for amplification, but does not say that RNA-catalyzed ligation requires only a short ribozyme sequence. The Discussion concerns the small active site of an aminoacylation ribozyme, not a ligation ribozyme. Searches for short ligation ribozymes and for template binding and daughter-strand separation found no passage establishing the cited clause. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Artificial selections have identified ribozymes capable of aminoacylating their own sequence or other sequences (and tRNAs) in trans at specific sites, using a variety of activated amino acids or modified precursors.

    “Artificial selections have identified ribozymes capable of aminoacylating their own sequence or other sequences (and tRNAs) in trans at specific sites, using a variety of activated amino acids or modified precursors (Figure 3A) [180–185].”

    From The RNA world as a model system to study the origin of life (2015) · cites this paper as [180]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]Cornell WD Cieplak P Bayly CI Gould IR Merz KM Ferguson DM Spellmeyer DC Fox T Caldwell JW Kollman PA Journal of the American Chemical Society 1995 117 19 5179 5197
  2. [24]Pappu RV Hart RK Ponder JW Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1998 102 48 9725 9742
  3. [34]Coleman TM Li N Huang FQ Tetrahedron Letters 2005 46 25 4307 4310

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chumachenko, N. V., Novikov, Y., & Yarus, M.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Yarus, M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2009-03-24
Volume
131
Issue
14
Pages
5257-5263
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2061052380
Cited by
68
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM48080, R01GM048080)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
conserved nucleotides, free energy minimization
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Nucleotides, Stereoisomerism, RNA, Catalytic, Catalytic Domain, Aminoacylation, SELEX Aptamer Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review