The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unprecedentedly High Selective Adsorption of Gas Mixtures in rho Zeolite-like Metal−Organic Framework: A Molecular Simulation Study
Abstract
We report a molecular simulation study for the separation of industrially important gas mixtures (CO(2)/H(2), CO(2)/CH(4), and CO(2)/N(2)) in rho zeolite-like metal-organic framework (rho-ZMOF). Rho-ZMOF contains a wide-open anionic framework and charge-balancing extraframework Na(+) ions. Two types of binding sites for Na(+) ions are identified in the framework. Site I is in the single eight-membered ring, whereas site II is in the alpha-cage. Na(+) ions at site I have a stronger affinity for the framework and thus a smaller mobility. The binding sites in rho-ZMOF resemble those in its inorganic counterpart rho-zeolite. CO(2) is adsorbed predominantly over other gases because of its strong electrostatic interactions with the charged framework and the presence of Na(+) ions acting as additional adsorption sites. At ambient temperature and pressure, the CO(2) selectivities are 1800 for the CO(2)/H(2) mixture, 80 for the CO(2)/CH(4) mixture, and 500 for the CO(2)/N(2) mixture. Compared with other MOFs and nanoporous materials reported to date, rho-ZMOF exhibits unprecedentedly high selective adsorption for these gas mixtures. This work represents the first simulation study to characterize extraframework ions and examine gas separation in a charged ZMOF. The simulation results reveal that rho-ZMOF is a promising candidate for the separation of syngas, natural gas, and flue gas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in principal factors influencing carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolites
Bonenfant, D., Kharoune, M., Niquette, P., Mimeault, M., & Hausler, R. (2008) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/9/1/013007 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials
D'Alessandro, D. M., Smit, B., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000431 · Cited by 4,046
Development and Evaluation of Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separation and Capture
Bae, Y., & Snurr, R. Q. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201101891 · Cited by 1,208
Saha, D., Grappe, H. A., Chakraborty, A., & Orkoulas, G. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00745 · Cited by 316
Applications of magnetic metal–organic framework composites
Ricco, R., Malfatti, L., Takahashi, M., Hill, A. J., & Falcaro, P. (2013) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c3ta13140h · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Babarao, R., & Jiang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-07-27
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 11417-11425
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2069548705
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.