Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 907

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening of Metal−Organic Frameworks for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Flue Gas Using a Combined Experimental and Modeling Approach

Yazaydın, A. Özgür, Snurr, Randall Q., Park, Tae-Hong, Koh, Kyoungmoo, Liu, Jian, LeVan, M. Douglas, Benin, Annabelle I., Jakubczak, Paulina, Lanuza, Mary, Galloway, Douglas B., Low, John J., Willis, Richard R.·2009·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A diverse collection of 14 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) was screened for CO(2) capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. Adsorption measurements are reported for the screened MOFs at room temperature up to 1 bar. These data are used to validate a generalized strategy for molecular modeling of CO(2) and other small molecules in MOFs. MOFs possessing a high density of open metal sites are found to adsorb significant amounts of CO(2) even at low pressure. An excellent correlation is found between the heat of adsorption and the amount of CO(2) adsorbed below 1 bar. Molecular modeling can aid in selection of adsorbents for CO(2) capture from flue gas by screening a large number of MOFs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja9057234

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greathouse J. A., 2009, Ind. End. Chem. Res., 48, 3425, 10.1021/ie801294n · doi:10.1021/ie801294n

Cited by

See all 907

Metadata

Authors
Yazaydın, A. Ö., Snurr, R. Q., Park, T.-H., Koh, K., Liu, J., LeVan, M. D., Benin, A. I., Jakubczak, P., Lanuza, M., Galloway, D. B., Low, J. J., & Willis, R. R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2009-12-02
Volume
131
Issue
51
Pages
18198-18199
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2156142084
Cited by
907
References
24
FWCI
36.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.