Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nucleation Kinetics vs Chemical Kinetics in the Initial Formation of Semiconductor Nanocrystals

Xie, Renguo, Li, Zheng, Peng, Xiaogang·2009·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The initial formation of semiconductor nanocrystals/nanoclusters, that is, nucleation in the classic literature, was examined both theoretically and experimentally. An experimental method based on determining the initial reaction rate for the formation of nanocrystals/nanoclusters with fixed size and size distribution was developed using InP and CdS nanocrystals/nanoclusters systems, especially the InP one. This experimental strategy relies on the size-dependent absorption spectra of these semiconductor nanoparticles as quantitative probes. The experimental results along with theoretical analysis indicate that the classic nucleation model was unlikely relevant for such crystallization systems, whose bulk crystal solubility in a solution is extremely low. Instead, the formation process was found to match a reaction-controlled kinetics model. The results further imply that understanding of crystallization and development of controlled synthesis of high quality colloidal nanocrystals are both closely related to identifying the molecular mechanism and chemical kinetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja9063102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Xie, R., Li, Z., & Peng, X.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2009-09-23
Volume
131
Issue
42
Pages
15457-15466
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2045795038
Cited by
223
References
1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.