Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Step Nucleation and Growth of InP Quantum Dots via Magic-Sized Cluster Intermediates

Open access
Gary, Dylan C., Terban, Maxwell W., Billinge, Simon J. L., Cossairt, Brandi M.·2015·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

We report on the role of magic-sized clusters (MSCs) as key intermediates in the synthesis of indium phosphide quantum dots (InP QDs) from molecular precursors. Heterogeneous growth from the MSCs directly to InP QDs was observed without intermediate sized particles. These observations suggest that previous efforts to control nucleation and growth by tuning precursor reactivity have been undermined by formation of these kinetically persistent MSCs prior to QD formation. The thermal stability of InP MSCs is influenced by the presence of exogenous bases as well as choice of the anionic ligand set. Addition of a primary amine, a common additive in previous InP QD syntheses, to carboxylate-terminated MSCs was found to bypass the formation of MSCs, allowing for homogeneous growth of InP QDs through a continuum of isolable sizes. Substitution of the carboxylate ligand set for a phosphonate ligand set increased the thermal stability of one particular InP MSC to 400 °C. The structure and optical properties of the MSCs with both carboxylate and phosphonate ligand sets were studied by UV–vis absorption spectroscopy, powder XRD analysis, and solution 31 P{ 1 H} and 1 H NMR spectroscopy. Finally, the carboxylate-terminated MSCs were identified as effective single-source precursors (SSPs) for the synthesis of high-quality InP QDs. Employing InP MSCs as SSPs for QDs effectively decouples the formation of MSCs from the subsequent second nucleation event and growth of InP QDs. The concentration dependence of this SSP reaction, as well as the shape uniformity of particles observed by TEM suggests that the stepwise growth from MSCs directly to QDs proceeds via a second nucleation event rather than an aggregative growth mechanism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00286

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Gary, D. C., Terban, M. W., Billinge, S. J. L., & Cossairt, B. M.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2015-02-10
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
1432-1441
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2320439837
Cited by
304
References
53
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Step Nucleation and Growth of InP Quantum Dots via Magic-Sized Cluster Intermediates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00286
The paper
Gary, D. C., Terban, M. W., Billinge, S. J. L., & Cossairt, B. M. (2015). Two-Step Nucleation and Growth of InP Quantum Dots via Magic-Sized Cluster Intermediates. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00286

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.