The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-adsorption and Separation of CO2−CH4 Mixtures in the Highly Flexible MIL-53(Cr) MOF
Abstract
The present study attempts to understand the use of the flexible porous chromium terephthalate Cr(OH)(O(2)C-C(6)H(4)-CO(2)) denoted MIL-53(Cr) (MIL = Material from Institut Lavoisier) for the separation of mixtures of CO(2) and CH(4) at ambient temperature. The coadsorption of CO(2) and CH(4) was studied by a variety of different techniques. In situ synchrotron X-ray Powder Diffraction allowed study of the breathing of the solid upon adsorption of the gas mixtures and simultaneously measured Raman spectra yielded an estimation of the adsorbed quantities of CO(2) and CH(4), as well as a quantification of the fraction of the narrow pore (NP) and the large pore (LP) form of MIL-53. Quantitative coadsorption data were then measured by gravimetry and by breakthrough curves. In addition, computer simulation was performed to calculate the composition of the adsorbed phase in comparison with experimental equilibrium isotherms and breakthrough results. The body of results shows that the coadsorption of CO(2) and CH(4) leads to a similar breathing of MIL-53(Cr) as with pure CO(2). The breathing is mainly controlled by the partial pressure of CO(2), but increasing the CH(4) content progressively decreases the transformation of LP to NP. CH(4) seems to be excluded from the NP form, which is filled exclusively by CO(2) molecules. The consequences in terms of CO(2)/CH(4) selectivity and the possible use of MIL-53(Cr) in a PSA process are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
An Amine-Functionalized MIL-53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO 2 and CH 4
Couck, S., Denayer, J. F. M., Baron, G. V., Rémy, T., Gascon, J., & Kapteijn, F. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja900555r · Cited by 988
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials
D'Alessandro, D. M., Smit, B., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000431 · Cited by 4,046
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: Status and challenges
Li, H., Li, L., Lin, R.-B., Zhou, W., Zhang, Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2019) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100006 · Cited by 891
Harnessing Filler Materials for Enhancing Biogas Separation Membranes
Chuah, C. Y., Goh, K., Yang, Y., Gong, H., Li, W., Karahan, H. E., Guiver, M. D., Wang, R., & Bae, T.-H. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00091 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamon, L., Llewellyn, P. L., Devic, T., Ghoufi, A., Clet, G., Guillerm, V., Pirngruber, G. D., Maurin, G., Serre, C., Driver, G., van Beek, W., Jolimaître, E., Vimont, A., Daturi, M., & Férey, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-11-11
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 17490-17499
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2071051228
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
