Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectroscopic Evidence for Intermolecular M−H···H−OR Hydrogen Bonding: Interaction of WH(CO)2(NO)L2 Hydrides with Acidic Alcohols

Shubina, Elena S., Belkova, Natalia V., Krylov, Aleksandr N., Vorontsov, Evgeni V., Epstein, Lina M., Gusev, Dmitri G., Niedermann, Martina, Berke, Heinz·1996·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Intermolecular hydrogen bonding of acidic alcohols (PhOH, (CF 3 ) 2 CHOH (HFIP), (CF 3 ) 3 CHOH (PFTB)) to the hydride ligand of WH(CO) 2 (NO)L 2 (L = PMe 3 ( 1 ), PEt 3 ( 2 ), P(O i Pr) 3 ( 3 ), PPh 3 ( 4 )) has been observed and characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy in hexane, toluene- d 8, and CD 2 Cl 2 solutions. The H-bonding is an equilibrium process with medium −Δ H ° of 4.1−6.9 kcal/mol; the enthalpy increases on going from 4 to 1, i.e., the strongest bonding is found for the smallest and the most basic L = PMe 3 . The value of −Δ H ° depends on the p K a of the proton donors, increasing as the acidity does (PhOH < HFIP < PFTB). The IR and NMR data suggest C 2 v symmetry around tungsten in the ROH···HW(CO) 2 (NO)L 2 adduct, with the H···H distance of 1.77 Å (L = PMe 3 ) estimated from the hydride T 1min relaxation time. The relevance of the hydrogen bonding to the mechanism of protonation of metal hydrides is suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja953094z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Shubina, E. S., Belkova, N. V., Krylov, A. N., Vorontsov, E. V., Epstein, L. M., Gusev, D. G., Niedermann, M., & Berke, H.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
118
Issue
5
Pages
1105-1112
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1987730216
Cited by
187
References
1
FWCI
19.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.