Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanism of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer for Quinone (QB) Reduction in Reaction Centers of Rb. Sphaeroides

Graige, M. S., Paddock, M. L., Bruce, J. M., Feher, G., Okamura, M. Y.·1996·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer reaction, + H + → Q A (Q B H) - was studied in reaction centers (RCs) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rb . sphaeroides by substituting quinones with different redox potentials into the Q A site. These substitutions change the driving force for electron transfer without affecting proton transfer rates or proton binding equilibria around the Q B site. The measured rate constants, increased with increasing electron driving force (by a factor of 10 per 160 meV change in redox free energy). The proton-coupled electron transfer was modeled by (i) four possible two-step mechanisms in which electron transfer can precede or follow proton transfer and can be either the rate determining or fast step in the overall reaction and (ii) a one-step mechanism involving the concerted transfer of an electron and a proton. The free energy dependencies of these possible mechanisms were predicted using Marcus theory and were compared to the observed dependence. The two stepwise mechanisms in which proton transfer is rate limiting predict very different free energy dependencies from that observed. The stepwise mechanism in which rate limiting electron transfer is followed by fast proton transfer predicts a free energy dependence similar to, but significantly larger than, the observed dependence. Additional arguments are presented against this mechanism. Thus, these three two-step mechanisms are excluded by the experimental data. The best agreement with the experimental data is given by a two-step mechanism in which fast reversible proton transfer is followed by rate limiting electron transfer. For this mechanism the observed free energy dependence for can be fitted using reasonable parameters of the Marcus theory. The free energy dependence predicted using a simple model for a concerted reaction also provides a reasonable fit to the data. Although the two-step mechanism (2) fits slightly better to the experimental data than the concerted mechanism, the uncertainty in the assumed parameters precludes a definitive conclusion. Thus, we propose a mechanism for proton-coupled electron transfer in native RCs (called proton-activated electron transfer) in which complete or partial protonation of the semiquinone increases the rate of the reaction by increasing the driving force for electron transfer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja960056m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Graige, M. S., Paddock, M. L., Bruce, J. M., Feher, G., & Okamura, M. Y.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
118
Issue
38
Pages
9005-9016
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1995701939
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.