Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intrusion of Counterions into the Spine of Hydration in the Minor Groove of B-DNA: Fractional Occupancy of Electronegative Pockets

Young, Matthew A., Jayaram, B., Beveridge, D. L.·1997·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A sequence of ordered solvent peaks in the electron density map of the minor groove region of ApT-rich tracts of the double helix is a characteristic of B-form DNA well established from crystallography. This feature, termed the “spine of hydration”, has been discussed as a stabilizing feature of B-DNA, the structure of which is known to be sensitive to environmental effects. Nanosecond-range molecular dynamics simulations on the DNA duplex of sequence d(CGCGAATTCGCG) have been carried out, including explicit consideration of ∼4000 water molecules and 22 Na + counterions, and based on the new AMBER 4.1 force field with the particle mesh Ewald summation used in the treatment of long-range interactions. The calculations support a dynamical model of B-DNA closer to the B form than any previously reported. Analysis of the dynamical structure of the solvent revealed that, in over half of the trajectory, a Na + ion is found in the minor groove localized at the ApT step. This position, termed herein the “ApT pocket”, was noted previously (Lavery, R.; Pullman, B. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1985, 5, 1021) to be of uniquely low negative electrostatic potential relative to other positions of the groove, a result supported by the location of a Na + ion in the crystal structure of the dApU miniduplex [Seeman, N.; et al. J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 104, 109) and by additional calculations described herein based on continuum electrostatics. The Na + ion in the ApT pocket interacts favorably with the thymine O2 atom on opposite strands of the duplex and is well articulated with the water molecules which constitute the remainder of the minor groove spine. This result indicates that counterions may intrude on the minor groove spine of hydration on B-form DNA and subsequently influence the environmental structure and thermodynamics in a sequence-dependent manner. The observed narrowing of the minor groove in the AATT region of the d(CGCGAATTCGCG) structure may be due to direct binding effects and also to indirect modulation of the electrostatic repulsions that occur when a counterion resides in the minor groove “AT pocket”. The idea of localized complexation of otherwise mobile counterions in electronegative pockets in the grooves of DNA helices introduces a heretofore mostly unappreciated source of sequence-dependent effects on local conformational, helicoidal, and morphological structure and may have important implications in understanding the functional energetics and specificity of the interactions of DNA and RNA with regulatory proteins, pharmaceutical agents, and other ligands.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja960459m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Young, M. A., Jayaram, B., & Beveridge, D. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
59-69
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2147454903
Cited by
343
References
0
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.