The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theoretical Studies of GG-Specific Photocleavage of DNA via Electron Transfer: Significant Lowering of Ionization Potential and 5‘-Localization of HOMO of Stacked GG Bases in B-Form DNA
Abstract
Ab initio molecular orbital calculations of stacked DNA bases were performed at the 3-21G(*) and 6-31G* levels to elucidate the origin of the 5‘-GG-3‘ sequence specificity for the photocleavage of DNA in the presence of electron-accepting photosensitizers. Ionization potentials (IP) were estimated as Koopman's theorem values for 16 sets of two stacked nucleobases and seven sets of stacked nucleobase pair systems in a B-form geometry. It was found that the GG/CC system is the lowest among the 10 possible stacked nucleobase pairs and that approximately 70% of the HOMO is localized on the 5‘-G of 5‘-GG-3‘. These calculations indicate that the 5‘-G of 5‘-GG-3‘ is the most electron donating site in B DNA and suggest that one-electron transfer from DNA to an electron acceptor occurs most effectively at 5‘-GG-3‘ sites which are fully consistent with the experimental data. In order to know the fate of the cation radical, the vertical IPs were estimated for seven stacked nucleobase pairs. It was found that the GG/CC system possesses the smallest vertical IP and that the cation radical is localized on the 5‘-G of 5‘-GG-3‘. These results imply that the 5‘-G of 5‘-GG-3‘ is a sink in “hole” migration through DNA, i . e ., an electron-loss center created in a B-form DNA will end up predominantly on the 5‘-G of 5‘-GG-3‘, and suggest that not only the base specificity for initial photoionization but also subsequent energetically favored hole migration to the lowest 5‘-GG-3‘ site are the origin of the 5‘-GG-3‘ specific cleavage. Calculations of stacked GGs with various geometries including orientations of A- and Z-form DNA were also examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stubbe, J., Nocera, D. G., Yee, C. S., & Chang, M. C. Y. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020421u · Cited by 823
Mechanisms for DNA Charge Transport
Genereux, J. C., & Barton, J. K. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900228f · Cited by 787
Banerjee, S., Veale, E. B., Phelan, C. M., Murphy, S. A., Tocci, G. M., Gillespie, L. J., Frimannsson, D. O., Kelly, J. M., & Gunnlaugsson, T. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35467e · Cited by 688
Electrochemistry of Nucleic Acids
Paleček, E., & Bartošík, M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200303p · Cited by 668
Singlet Molecular Oxygen Reactions with Nucleic Acids, Lipids, and Proteins
Di Mascio, P., Martinez, G. R., Miyamoto, S., Ronsein, G. E., Medeiros, M. H. G., & Cadet, J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00554 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugiyama, H., & Saito, I.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 7063-7068
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2085134918
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Studies of GG-Specific Photocleavage of DNA via Electron Transfer: Significant Lowering of Ionization Potential and 5‘-Localization of HOMO of Stacked GG Bases in B-Form DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja9609821
- The paper
- Sugiyama, H., & Saito, I. (1996). Theoretical Studies of GG-Specific Photocleavage of DNA via Electron Transfer: Significant Lowering of Ionization Potential and 5‘-Localization of HOMO of Stacked GG Bases in B-Form DNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9609821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.