The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Bulky Substituents in Brookhart-Type Ni(II) Diimine Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization: A Combined Density Functional Theory and Molecular Mechanics Study
Abstract
The role of the bulky ligands in Ni(II) diimine catalyzed ethylene polymerization has been examined with a combined density functional theory quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) model. Specifically, we have examined the catalytic center of the type (ArN C(R)−C(R) NAr)Ni II -R‘ +, where R = Me and Ar = 2,6-C 6 H 3 ( i -Pr) 2 . The Ar and R groups were treated by a molecular mechanics force field while density functional theory was applied to the remainder of the system. The chain propagation, chain branching, and chain termination processes have been investigated with the hybrid method and found to have barriers of Δ H ⧧ = 11.8, 15.3, and 18.4 kcal/mol, respectively, which is in excellent agreement with experiment in both absolute and relative terms. This is in stark contrast to the pure QM model in which the influence of the bulky Ar and R groups was neglected and the established order of the barriers is not even reproduced. The role played by the bulky substituents is dual in nature. First, the Ar and R groups act to sterically hinder the axial coordination sites of the Ni center. This has the most dramatic destabilizing effect on the resting state and termination transition states, in which both axial positions are occupied. In addition to the steric factor, we find that the electronic preference for the aryl rings to orient themselves in a coplanar fashion with the diimine ring results in a stabilization of the insertion transition state relative to the resting state. These two factors act to both lower the propagation barrier and increase the termination barrier compared to the “naked” pure QM model system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Cited by
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Self-citationTowards the online computer-aided design of catalytic pockets
Falivene, L., Cao, Z., Petta, A., Serra, L., Poater, A., Oliva, R., Scarano, V., & Cavallo, L. (2019) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-019-0319-5 · Cited by 1,290
Self-citationExploring Ethylene/Polar Vinyl Monomer Copolymerizations Using Ni and Pd α-Diimine Catalysts
Chen, Z., & Brookhart, M. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00225 · Cited by 405
Bite angle effects in diphosphine metal catalysts: steric or electronic?
Freixa, Z., & van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. (2003) · Dalton Trans. · doi:10.1039/b300322c · Cited by 391
Modeling Metal-Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization
Rappé, A. K., Skiff, W. M., & Casewit, C. J. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9902493 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, L., Woo, T. K., Cavallo, L., Margl, P. M., & Ziegler, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 6177-6186
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1993736232
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.