Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Bulky Substituents in Brookhart-Type Ni(II) Diimine Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization: A Combined Density Functional Theory and Molecular Mechanics Study

Deng, Liqun, Woo, Tom K., Cavallo, Luigi, Margl, Peter M., Ziegler, Tom·1997·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The role of the bulky ligands in Ni(II) diimine catalyzed ethylene polymerization has been examined with a combined density functional theory quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) model. Specifically, we have examined the catalytic center of the type (ArN C(R)−C(R) NAr)Ni II -R‘ +, where R = Me and Ar = 2,6-C 6 H 3 ( i -Pr) 2 . The Ar and R groups were treated by a molecular mechanics force field while density functional theory was applied to the remainder of the system. The chain propagation, chain branching, and chain termination processes have been investigated with the hybrid method and found to have barriers of Δ H ⧧ = 11.8, 15.3, and 18.4 kcal/mol, respectively, which is in excellent agreement with experiment in both absolute and relative terms. This is in stark contrast to the pure QM model in which the influence of the bulky Ar and R groups was neglected and the established order of the barriers is not even reproduced. The role played by the bulky substituents is dual in nature. First, the Ar and R groups act to sterically hinder the axial coordination sites of the Ni center. This has the most dramatic destabilizing effect on the resting state and termination transition states, in which both axial positions are occupied. In addition to the steric factor, we find that the electronic preference for the aryl rings to orient themselves in a coplanar fashion with the diimine ring results in a stabilization of the insertion transition state relative to the resting state. These two factors act to both lower the propagation barrier and increase the termination barrier compared to the “naked” pure QM model system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja970226a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Deng, L., Woo, T. K., Cavallo, L., Margl, P. M., & Ziegler, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
119
Issue
26
Pages
6177-6186
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1993736232
Cited by
333
References
1
FWCI
21.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.