The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methane−Methanol Conversion by MnO+, FeO+, and CoO+: A Theoretical Study of Catalytic Selectivity
Abstract
The entire reaction pathway for the gas-phase methane−methanol conversion by late transition-metal-oxide ions, MnO +, FeO +, and CoO +, is studied using an ab initio hybrid (Hartree−Fock/density-functional) method. For these oxo complexes, the methane−methanol conversion is proposed to proceed via two transition states (TSs) in such a way MO + + CH 4 → OM + (CH 4 ) → [TS1] → HO−M + −CH 3 → [TS2] → M + (CH 3 OH) → M + + CH 3 OH, where M is Mn, Fe, and Co. A crossing between high-spin and low-spin potential energy surfaces occurs both at the entrance channel and at the exit channel for FeO + and CoO +, but it occurs only once near TS2 for MnO + . The activation energy from OMn + (CH 4 ) to HO−Mn + −CH 3 via TS1 is calculated to be 9.4 kcal/mol, being much smaller than 22.1 and 30.9 kcal/mol for FeO + and CoO +, respectively. This agrees with the experimentally reported efficiencies for the reactions. The excellent agreement between theory and experiment indicates that HO−M + −CH 3 plays a central role as an intermediate in the reaction between MO + and methane and that the reaction efficiency is most likely to be determined by the activation energy from OM + (CH 4 ) to HO−M + −CH 3 via TS1. We discuss in terms of qualitative orbital interactions why MnO + (d 4 oxo complex) is most effective for methane C−H bond activation. The activation energy from HO−M + −CH 3 to M + (CH 3 OH) via TS2 is computed to be 24.6, 28.6, and 35.9 kcal/mol for CoO +, FeO +, and MnO +, respectively. This result explains an experimental result that the methanol-branching ratio in the reaction between MO + and methane is 100% in CoO +, 41% in FeO +, and < 1% in MnO + . We demonstrate that both the barrier heights of TS1 and TS2 would determine general catalytic selectivity for the methane−methanol conversion by the MO + complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Cited by
A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory
Koch, W., & Holthausen, M. C. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600043 · Cited by 4,880
Selective Activation of Alkanes by Gas-Phase Metal Ions
Roithová, J., & Schröder, D. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900183p · Cited by 477
Fokin, A. A., & Schreiner, P. R. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr000453m · Cited by 411
Noodleman, L., Lovell, T., Han, W.-G., Li, J., & Himo, F. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020625a · Cited by 373
The Comparison between Single Atom Catalysis and Surface Organometallic Catalysis
Samantaray, M. K., D’Elia, V., Pump, E., Falivene, L., Harb, M., Ould Chikh, S., Cavallo, L., & Basset, J.-M. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00238 · Cited by 287
Fenton-like Chemistry in Water: Oxidation Catalysis by Fe(III) and H2O2
Ensing, B., Buda, F., & Baerends, E. J. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0267149 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshizawa, K., Shiota, Y., & Yamabe, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 564-572
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2086564895
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.