Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methane−Methanol Conversion by MnO+, FeO+, and CoO+: A Theoretical Study of Catalytic Selectivity

Yoshizawa, Kazunari, Shiota, Yoshihito, Yamabe, Tokio·1998·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The entire reaction pathway for the gas-phase methane−methanol conversion by late transition-metal-oxide ions, MnO +, FeO +, and CoO +, is studied using an ab initio hybrid (Hartree−Fock/density-functional) method. For these oxo complexes, the methane−methanol conversion is proposed to proceed via two transition states (TSs) in such a way MO + + CH 4 → OM + (CH 4 ) → [TS1] → HO−M + −CH 3 → [TS2] → M + (CH 3 OH) → M + + CH 3 OH, where M is Mn, Fe, and Co. A crossing between high-spin and low-spin potential energy surfaces occurs both at the entrance channel and at the exit channel for FeO + and CoO +, but it occurs only once near TS2 for MnO + . The activation energy from OMn + (CH 4 ) to HO−Mn + −CH 3 via TS1 is calculated to be 9.4 kcal/mol, being much smaller than 22.1 and 30.9 kcal/mol for FeO + and CoO +, respectively. This agrees with the experimentally reported efficiencies for the reactions. The excellent agreement between theory and experiment indicates that HO−M + −CH 3 plays a central role as an intermediate in the reaction between MO + and methane and that the reaction efficiency is most likely to be determined by the activation energy from OM + (CH 4 ) to HO−M + −CH 3 via TS1. We discuss in terms of qualitative orbital interactions why MnO + (d 4 oxo complex) is most effective for methane C−H bond activation. The activation energy from HO−M + −CH 3 to M + (CH 3 OH) via TS2 is computed to be 24.6, 28.6, and 35.9 kcal/mol for CoO +, FeO +, and MnO +, respectively. This result explains an experimental result that the methanol-branching ratio in the reaction between MO + and methane is 100% in CoO +, 41% in FeO +, and < 1% in MnO + . We demonstrate that both the barrier heights of TS1 and TS2 would determine general catalytic selectivity for the methane−methanol conversion by the MO + complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja971723u

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Yoshizawa, K., Shiota, Y., & Yamabe, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
564-572
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2086564895
Cited by
172
References
1
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.