The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism
Abstract
4D-QSAR analysis incorporates conformational and alignment freedom into the development of 3D-QSAR models for training sets of structure−activity data by performing ensemble averaging, the fourth “dimension”. The descriptors in 4D-QSAR analysis are the grid cell (spatial) occupancy measures of the atoms composing each molecule in the training set realized from the sampling of conformation and alignment spaces. Grid cell occupancy descriptors can be generated for any atom type, group, and/or model pharmacophore. A single “active” conformation can be postulated for each compound in the training set and combined with the optimal alignment for use in other molecular design applications including other 3D-QSAR methods. The influence of the conformational entropy of each compound on its activity can be estimated. Serial use of partial least-squares, PLS, regression and a genetic algorithm, GA, is used to perform data reduction and identify the manifold of top 3D-QSAR models for a training set. The unique manifold of 3D-QSAR models is arrived at by computing the extent of orthogonality in the residuals of error among the most significant 3D-QSAR models in the general GA population. Receptor independent (RI) 4D-QSAR analysis has been successfully applied to three training sets: (a) benzylpyrimidine inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase, (b) prostaglandin PGF 2 α antinidatory analogs, and, (c) dipyridodiazepinone inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). Two general findings from these applications are that grid cell occupancy descriptors associated with the “constant” chemical structure of an analog series can be significant in the 3D-QSAR models and that there is an enormous data reduction in constructing 3D-QSAR models. The resultant 3D-QSAR models can be graphically represented by plotting the significant 3D-QSAR grid cells in space along with their descriptor attributes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Rogers, D., & Hopfinger, A. J. (1994) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci00020a020 · Cited by 982
Self-citationPrinciples of Medicinal Chemistry
Delgado, J. N. (1975) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600641047 · Cited by 723
Arveson, W. (2002) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/0-387-21518-2_4 · Cited by 478
Molecular mechanics force‐field parameterization procedures
Hopfinger, A. J., & Pearlstein, R. A. (1984) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540050510 · Cited by 145
Self-citationProudfoot, J., Hargrave, K. D., Kapadia, S., Patel, U. R., Grözinger, K. G., McNeil, D. W., Cullen, E. P., Cardozo, M. G., & Tong, L. (1995) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm00024a010 · Cited by 39
Hopfinger, A. J., Burke, B. J., & Dunn, W. J. (1994) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm00048a013 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Cited by
Zahrt, A. F., Athavale, S. V., & Denmark, S. E. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00425 · Cited by 212
Myint, K.-Z., Wang, L., Tong, Q., & Xie, X.-Q. (2012) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp300237z · Cited by 139
Henle, J. J., Zahrt, A. F., Rose, B. T., Darrow, W. T., Wang, Y., & Denmark, S. E. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c04715 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopfinger, A. J., Wang, S., Tokarski, J. S., Jin, B., Albuquerque, M., Madhav, P. J., & Duraiswami, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 10509-10524
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1984811139
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.