The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Na+ Binding to Cyclic and Linear Dipeptides. Bond Energies, Entropies of Na+ Complexation, and Attachment Sites from the Dissociation of Na+-Bound Heterodimers and ab Initio Calculations
Abstract
The Na + affinities of simple cyclic and linear dipeptides and of selected derivatives are determined in the gas-phase based on the dissociations of Na + -bound heterodimers [peptide + B i ]Na +, in which B i represents a reference base of known Na + affinity (kinetic method). The decompositions of [peptide + B i ]Na + are assessed at three different internal energies; this approach permits the deconvolution of entropic contributions from experimentally measured free energies to thus obtain affinity (i.e. enthalpy or bond energy) values. The Na + affinities of the peptides studied increase in the order (kJ mol - 1 ) cyclo -glycylglycine (143) < cyclo -alanylglycine (149) < cyclo -alanylalanine (151) < N -acetyl glycine (172) < glycylglycine (177) < alanylglycine (178) < glycylalanine (179) < alanylalanine (180) < glycylglycine ethyl ester (181) < glycylglycine amide (183). The method used provides quantitative information about the difference in bond entropies between the peptide−Na + and B i −Na + bonds, which is most significant when Na + complexation alters rotational degrees of freedom either in the peptide or in B i . From the relative bond entropies, it is possible to appraise absolute entropies of Na + attachment, which are ∼104 and ∼116 J mol - 1 K - 1 for the cyclic and linear molecules, respectively. The combined affinity and entropy data point out that the cyclic dipeptides bind Na + in a monodentate fashion through one of their amide carbonyl oxygens, while the linear molecules coordinate Na + in a multidentate arrangement involving the two carbonyl oxygens and, possibly, the N-terminal amino group. High-level ab initio calculations reveal that the most stable [glycylglycine]Na + structure arises upon bidentate chelation of Na + by the two carbonyls and concomitant formation of a hydrogen bond between the amino group and the amide nitrogen. Such a structure agrees very well with the experimental enthalpy and entropy trends observed for the linear molecules. According to theory, zwitterionic forms of [glycylglycine]Na + are the least stable isomers, as also suggested by the experimental results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Noncovalent metal-ligand bond energies as studied by threshold collision-induced dissociation
Rodgers, M. T., & Armentrout, P. B. (2000) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/1098-2787(200007)19:4<215::aid-mas2>3.0.co;2-x · Cited by 354
Hoyau, S., Norrman, K., McMahon, T. B., & Ohanessian, G. (1999) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9841198 · Cited by 273
Self-citationTamura, K. (2008) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.12.005 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerda, B. A., Hoyau, S., Ohanessian, G., & Wesdemiotis, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-02-26
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2437-2448
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2001705443
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Na+ Binding to Cyclic and Linear Dipeptides. Bond Energies, Entropies of Na+ Complexation, and Attachment Sites from the Dissociation of Na+-Bound Heterodimers and ab Initio Calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja972417j
- The paper
- Cerda, B. A., Hoyau, S., Ohanessian, G., & Wesdemiotis, C. (1998). Na+ Binding to Cyclic and Linear Dipeptides. Bond Energies, Entropies of Na+ Complexation, and Attachment Sites from the Dissociation of Na+-Bound Heterodimers and ab Initio Calculations. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja972417j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.