The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices
Abstract
We apply continuum solvent models to investigate the relative stability of A- and B-form helices for three DNA sequences, d(CCAACGTTGG) 2, d(ACCCGCGGGT) 2, and d(CGCGAATTCGCG) 2, a phosphoramidate-modified DNA duplex, p(CGCGAATTCGCG) 2, in which the O3‘ atom in deoxyribose is replaced with NH, and an RNA duplex, r(CCAACGUUGG) 2 . Structures were taken as snapshots from multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations computed in a consistent fashion using explicit solvent and with long-range electrostatics accounted for using the particle−mesh Ewald procedure. The electrostatic contribution to solvation energies were computed using both a finite-difference Poisson−Boltzmann (PB) model and a pairwise generalized Born model; nonelectrostatic contributions were estimated with a surface-area-dependent term. To these solvation free energies were added the mean solute internal energies (determined from a molecular mechanics potential) and estimates of the solute entropy (from a harmonic analysis). Consistent with experiment, the relative energies favor B-form helices for DNA and A-form helices for the NP-modified system and for RNA. Salt effects, modeled at the linear or nonlinear PB level, favor the A-form helices by modest amounts; for d(ACCCGCGGGT) 2, salt is nearly able to switch the conformational preference to “A”. The results provide a physical interpretation for the origins of the relative stabilities of A- and B-helices and suggest that similar analyses might be useful in a variety of nucleic acid conformational problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Self-citationKollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Self-citationg_mmpbsa—A GROMACS Tool for High-Throughput MM-PBSA Calculations
Kumari, R., Kumar, R., Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium, & Lynn, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500020m · Cited by 4,882
Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery
Meng, X.-Y., Zhang, H.-X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M. (2011) · Current Computer Aided-Drug Design · doi:10.2174/157340911795677602 · Cited by 3,771
gmx_MMPBSA: A New Tool to Perform End-State Free Energy Calculations with GROMACS
Valdés-Tresanco, M. S., Valdés-Tresanco, M. E., Valiente, P. A., & Moreno, E. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00645 · Cited by 3,393
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasan, J., Cheatham, T. E., Cieplak, P., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-08-26
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 9401-9409
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1978330227
- Cited by
- 1,628
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja981844+
- The paper
- Srinivasan, J., Cheatham, T. E., Cieplak, P., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A. (1998). Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja981844%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.