Cited by 3,771Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery

Open access
Meng, Xuan-Yu, Zhang, Hong-Xing, Mezei, Mihaly, Cui, Meng·2011·Current Computer Aided-Drug Design

Abstract

Molecular docking has become an increasingly important tool for drug discovery. In this review, we present a brief introduction of the available molecular docking methods, and their development and applications in drug discovery. The relevant basic theories, including sampling algorithms and scoring functions, are summarized. The differences in and performance of available docking software are also discussed. Flexible receptor molecular docking approaches, especially those including backbone flexibility in receptors, are a challenge for available docking methods. A recently developed Local Move Monte Carlo (LMMC) based approach is introduced as a potential solution to flexible receptor docking problems. Three application examples of molecular docking approaches for drug discovery are provided. Keywords: Conformational sampling, scoring, flexible protein-ligand docking, backbone flexibility, local move Monte Carlo sampling, molecular docking, drug discovery, virtual screening, high throughput screening, QSAR

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/157340911795677602

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [108]Totrov M Abagyan R Raffa RB Protein-ligand docking as an energy optimization problem Drug-receptor thermodynamics: Introduction and experimental applications 2001 603 624 John Wiley & Sons New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meng, X.-Y., Zhang, H.-X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
  • Meng, Xuan-Yu
  • Cui, Meng
Venue
Current Computer Aided-Drug Design
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
146-157
ISSN
1573-4099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152630148
Cited by
3,771
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 500 · 2025: 522 · 2024: 569 · 2023: 508 · 2022: 489 · 2021: 340 · 2020: 278 · 2019: 178 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 4
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Computer - Aided Drug Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC008996, R21DC008996)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR027411)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
molecular docking, structure-based drug design, conformational sampling, scoring functions, backbone flexibility, protein-ligand docking, virtual screening
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Monte Carlo Method, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review