Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Altering Ligand Fields in Single-Atom Sites through Second-Shell Anion Modulation Boosts the Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Qin, Jiayi, Liu, Hui, Zou, Peichao, Zhang, Rui, Wang, Chunyang, Xin, Huolin L.·2022·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Single-atom catalysts based on metal–N 4 moieties and anchored on carbon supports (defined as M–N–C) are promising for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Among those, M–N–C catalysts with 4d and 5d transition metal (TM 4d,5d ) centers are much more durable and not susceptible to the undesirable Fenton reaction, especially compared with 3d transition metal based ones. However, the ORR activity of these TM 4d,5d –N–C catalysts is still far from satisfactory; thus far, there are few discussions about how to accurately tune the ligand fields of single-atom TM 4d,5d sites in order to improve their catalytic properties. Herein, we leverage single-atom Ru–N–C as a model system and report an S-anion coordination strategy to modulate the catalyst’s structure and ORR performance. The S anions are identified to bond with N atoms in the second coordination shell of Ru centers, which allows us to manipulate the electronic configuration of central Ru sites. The S-anion-coordinated Ru–N–C catalyst delivers not only promising ORR activity but also outstanding long-term durability, superior to those of commercial Pt/C and most of the near-term single-atom catalysts. DFT calculations reveal that the high ORR activity is attributed to the lower adsorption energy of ORR intermediates at Ru sites. Metal–air batteries using this catalyst in the cathode side also exhibit fast kinetics and excellent stability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.1c11331

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Qin, J., Liu, H., Zou, P., Zhang, R., Wang, C., & Xin, H. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2022-01-28
Volume
144
Issue
5
Pages
2197-2207
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W4210692642
Cited by
405
References
3
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Altering Ligand Fields in Single-Atom Sites through Second-Shell Anion Modulation Boosts the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.1c11331
The paper
Qin, J., Liu, H., Zou, P., Zhang, R., Wang, C., & Xin, H. L. (2022). Altering Ligand Fields in Single-Atom Sites through Second-Shell Anion Modulation Boosts the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.