The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjugated Three-Dimensional High-Connected Covalent Organic Frameworks for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Developing conjugated three-dimensional (3D) covalent organic frameworks (COFs) still remains an extremely difficult task due to the lack of enough conjugated 3D building blocks. Herein, condensation between an 8-connected pentiptycene-based D 2h building block (DMOPTP) and 4-connected square-planar linkers affords two 3D COFs (named 3D-scu-COF-1 and 3D-scu-COF-2). A combination of the 3D homoaromatic conjugated structure of the former building block with the 2D conjugated structure of the latter linking units enables the π-electron delocalization over the whole frameworks of both COFs, endowing them with excellent conductivities of 3.2–3.5 × 10 –5 S cm –1 . In particular, the 3D rigid quadrangular prism shape of DMOPTP guides the formation of a twofold interpenetrated scu 3D topology and high-connected permanent porosity with a large Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 2340 and 1602 m 2 g –1 for 3D-scu-COF-1 and 3D-scu-COF-2, respectively, ensuring effective small molecule storage and mass transport characteristics. This, in combination with their good charge transport properties, renders them promising sulfur host materials for lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) with high capacities (1035–1155 mA h g –1 at 0.2 C, 1 C = 1675 mA g –1 ), excellent rate capabilities (713–757 mA h g –1 at 5.0 C), and superior cycling stability (71–83% capacity retention at 2.0 C after 500 cycles), surpassing the most of organic LSB cathodes reported thus far.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b810189b · Cited by 14,648
Metal–organic frameworks as a platform for clean energy applications
Li, X., Yang, X., Xue, H., Pang, H., & Xu, Q. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 · Cited by 706
Self-citation
Cited by
Feng, X., Wang, X., Redshaw, C., & Tang, B. Z. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00251a · Cited by 382
Hu, B., Xu, J., Fan, Z., Xu, C., Han, S., Zhang, J., Ma, L., Ding, B., Zhuang, Z., Kang, Q., et al. (2023) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202203540 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, W., Gong, L., Liu, Z., Jin, Y., Pan, H., Yang, X., Yu, B., Li, N., Qi, D., Wang, K., Wang, H., & Jiang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-09-09
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 17209-17218
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W4296236259
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.