Cited by 39Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionHydrogen Storage and MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Local Structure Insight into Hydrogen Evolution Reaction with Bimetal Nanocatalysts

Li, Qiang, Zhu, He, Chen, Xiaoyu, Liu, Hui, Ren, Yang, Chen, Yanan, Ohara, Koji, Zhou, Lihui +6 more·2022·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The revelation of the atomic 3D structure of sub-5 nm bimetal nanocatalysts challenges the limitations of conventional methods. Notably, the identification of the cooperative relationship between the active sites and nearby coordination environment during catalytic reactions depends on the stereo distribution of local phases and chemical composition within a short range. As a model nanocatalyst in our investigation, we studied the ordered PtFe bimetals in hydrogen evolution reactions (HER). By combining pair distribution functions with reverse Monte Carlo, local-range phase symmetry, chemical composition, and atom distribution were determined. The segregation of local phase segments as disordered Pt-rich A1 and Pt 3 Fe L1 2 phases can be attributed to the marked improvement of HER activity and stability in Pt 56 Fe 44 . Following the etching of the outermost-surface Fe, the remaining disordered segregation offered a large number of active Pt sites for discharge and electrochemical desorption reactions. It resulted in local-bonding Pt pairs that made it easier for adsorbed hydrogen atoms to recombine. The current research will provide structural insight into the local range for bimetal nanocatalysts and be valuable for the creation of new, low-cost nanocatalysts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.2c07844

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., Zhu, H., Chen, X., Liu, H., Ren, Y., Chen, Y., Ohara, K., Zhou, L., Chen, J., Deng, J., Miao, J., Lin, K., Kuang, X., & Xing, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JP)
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Guilin University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Xing, Xianran
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2022-10-27
Volume
144
Issue
44
Pages
20298-20305
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W4307427606
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2020YFA0406202)
  • Bagui Scholars Program of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M660446, BX20190031)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21731001, 22090042, 22175018)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, local structure, pair distribution function, reverse Monte Carlo, surface etching, electrochemical desorption, hydrogen adsorption, active site, electrocatalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review